Identification of restriction endonuclease with potential ability to cleave the HSV-2 genome: Inherent potential for biosynthetic versus live recombinant microbicides

  • Misaki Wayengera1, 2, 3, 4Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Henry Kajumbula1, 3 and

      Affiliated with

      • Wilson Byarugaba1, 4

        Affiliated with

        Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling20085:18

        DOI: 10.1186/1742-4682-5-18

        Received: 19 June 2008

        Accepted: 07 August 2008

        Published: 07 August 2008

        Abstract

        Background

        Herpes Simplex virus types 1 and 2 are enveloped viruses with a linear dsDNA genome of ~120–200 kb. Genital infection with HSV-2 has been denoted as a major risk factor for acquisition and transmission of HIV-1. Developing biomedical strategies for HSV-2 prevention is thus a central strategy in reducing global HIV-1 prevalence. This paper details the protocol for the isolation of restriction endunucleases (REases) with potent activity against the HSV-2 genome and models two biomedical interventions for preventing HSV-2.

        Methods and Results

        Using the whole genome of HSV-2, 289 REases and the bioinformatics software Webcutter2; we searched for potential recognition sites by way of genome wide palindromics. REase application in HSV-2 biomedical therapy was modeled concomitantly. Of the 289 enzymes analyzed; 77(26.6%) had potential to cleave the HSV-2 genome in > 100 but < 400 sites; 69(23.9%) in > 400 but < 700 sites; and the 9(3.1%) enzymes: BmyI, Bsp1286I, Bst2UI, BstNI, BstOI, EcoRII, HgaI, MvaI, and SduI cleaved in more than 700 sites. But for the 4: PacI, PmeI, SmiI, SwaI that had no sign of activity on HSV-2 genomic DNA, all 130(45%) other enzymes cleaved < 100 times. In silico palindromics has a PPV of 99.5% for in situ REase activity (2) Two models detailing how the REase EcoRII may be applied in developing interventions against HSV-2 are presented: a nanoparticle for microbicide development and a "recombinant lactobacillus" expressing cell wall anchored receptor (truncated nectin-1) for HSV-2 plus EcoRII.

        Conclusion

        Viral genome slicing by way of these bacterially- derived R-M enzymatic peptides may have therapeutic potential in HSV-2 infection; a cofactor for HIV-1 acquisition and transmission.

        Background

        About 38.6 million people worldwide are now living with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), which causes AIDS [1]. Heterosexual contact is the predominant mode of transmission of HIV infections worldwide. Women are at particularly increased risk of acquiring HIV through heterosexual contact. Despite this gender disparity, there are to date only limited options by which women may actively protect themselves against HIV. [2]. Recent studies have defined factors that are associated with increased susceptibility to HIV-1 [3, 4]. Among these, genital infection with herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) is considered a major cofactor for both sexual transmission and acquisition of HIV-1 [5]. HSV-2 is a member of the genus of double-stranded DNA viruses called simplexvirus. HSV-2 together with its generic relative HSV-1 causes blistering lesions of the cervico-vaginal and oral mucosa, respectively. Fleming and Wasserheit recently provided biological, epidemiological and interventional evidence to support the view that infection with HSV-2 may significantly promote HIV transmission and acquisition [6]. Biologically, they show that HSV-2 does this by disrupting mucosal integrity [6], increasing the genital viral loads and numbers of activated immune cells that are susceptible to HIV-1 tropism [7, 8]. Specifically, it increases the infectiousness of HIV-infected subjects through increased genital HIV load during a genital HSV-2 recurrence [7, 8] by the transactivation of HIV-1 LTR through interaction with HSV proteins (ICPO, ICP4) or the production of pro-inflammatory chemokines known to enhance HIV-1 replication [9, 10]. Similarly, HSV-2 may mediate the recruitment of activated CD4+ cells [11] that markedly up-regulate HIV replication in HSV-infected lesions [12]. It has recently been shown that HIV-1 interacts at the cellular level to form HIV-1 hybrid virions that are pseudotyped with HSV-1 envelope glycoproteins gD and gB, thus expanding HIV-1 cell tropism to include mucosal epithelial cells [13, 14]. This has led to the hypothesis that HSV-2 may similarly interact with HIV-1 to form such "pseudotypes" with potential to infect other cells, although a recent study failed to provide evidence for such interaction [15].

        In the light of the above evidence, developing biomedical strategies for the prevention of sexual transmission of HSV-2 has become recognized as a critical strategy in the control of sexual transmission of HIV-1 [16]. We recently described pre-integration viral genome slicing [PRINT_GSX] as a novel model for devising antiviral gene-based therapies using a retrovirus replication model (HIV cDNA) [17]. This approach explores the natural antiviral defense model inherent in bacteria through a nucleic-acid enzymatic system called the restriction modification (R-M) system [18]. Bacteria endowed with R-M systems have been shown to be remarkably resistant to tropism by bacteriophages. Four taxonomic classes of R-M systems are recognized to day, with type II being the most widespread [18]. Type II R-M systems comprise two distinct peptides functioning respectively as restriction endonuclease (REase) and cognate methyltransferase (MTase). As a model illustration of function, class I RMS systems, the evolutionary ancestors of R-M systems, are employed here. The class I RMS of Escherichia coli strain K-12 comprises 6 enzymes, of which the respective genes are located on the bacterial chromosome in a region called an immigration island: the hsdS gene, hsdR gene, hsdM gene, mcrB/C genes and mrr gene. Products of the first two genes play the central antiviral defense function (by recognizing and splicing the exogenous DNA through recognizing 4–12 base pair palindromes; that is nucleotide sequences that read the same in both directions). The site specific subunit hsdS product serves to recognize the specific 4–12 " palindromic" base pair sequence in the genome of the invading phage, while the hsdR restriction subunit product cleaves the DNA if this site is unmethylated. The other 4 gene products serve to protect the host genome as follows: the hsdM gene product is a methyltransferase that transfers a methyl group from S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to the DNA at the indicated A residues; the mcrBC system restricts DNA containing methylcytosine residues; while the mrr system restricts DNA with m6-methyladenine or m6-methylcytosine [19, 20].

        The aim of this study is to extend our previous work on viral genome slicing (GSX) to HSV-2 by identifying REases (DNases) with potent ability to cleave the HSV-2 genome. Although the replicative cycles of some eukaryotic viruses such as HSV-2 do not necessary involve viral genome integration into the host nuclear DNA as occurs for retroviruses, we propose that these REases are equally worth exploring for the development of novel HSV-2 microbicides. Two models are proposed for using the REase EcoRII to target HSV-2: first, by cross-linking the enzyme through the formation of C31G (Savvy) and EcoRII PLGA-loaded nanoparticles (nano-C31G-EcoRII); second, by expressing EcoRII in Lactobacillus that also expresses a truncated recombinant form of the receptor nectin-1 (xREPLAB-tN1). The former are nanoparticles that may be explored to develop a model combinational microbicide, while the latter is a model "live" microbicide strategy for diverting and disrupting infectious HSV-2 particles.

        Results

        A. HSV-2 genome-wide in silico palindromics: REases with HSV-2 genome cleaving potential

        Of the 289 enzymes from the REBASE database analyzed; 77 (26.6%) demonstrated potential to cleave the HSV-genome in > 100 but < 400 sites (see Table 1 for details) and 69 (23.9%) enzymes cleaved in > 400 but < 700 sites (see Table 2). Nine (3.1%) enzymes had more than 700 potential cleavage sites: BmyI, Bsp1286I, Bst2UI, BstNI, BstOI, EcoRII, HgaI, MvaI, and SduI, all of which are Type II restriction enzyme subtype P, derived respectively from the bacteria Bacillus mycoides [21], Bacillus sphaericus [22], Bacillus stearothermophilus 2U, Bacillus stearothermophilus [23], Bacillus stearothermophilus O22, Escherichia coli R245 [24], Haemophilus gallinarum [25] Micrococcus varians RFL19 [26] and Streptococcus durans RFL3 [27] (see table 3). However, for the 4 that had no sign of activity on HSV-2 genomic DNA (PacI, PmeI, SmiI, SwaI – [for details see Additional file 1]), all 130 (45%) other enzymes cleaved < 100 times. We have previously demonstrated that in silico palindromics, a novel downstream science of genomics for analysis of restriction enzyme activity using Webcutter software version 2, has a PPV of 99.5% for in situ REase activity [18].
        Table 1

        REase (DNase) enzymes cutting HSV-2 genome in > 100, but < 400 sites

        Enzyme name

        Genomic splices (palindrome)

        AccBSI

        164(gagcgg)

        AccI

        111(gt/mkac)

        AclWI

        225(ggatc)

        AflIII

        127(a/crygt)

        Alw21I

        203(gwgcw/c)

        Alw26I

        308 (gtctc)

        AlwI

        225 (ggatc)

        ApaI

        267 (gggcc/c)

        AspHI

        203 (gwgcw/c)

        BbeI

        261 (ggcgc/c)

        Bbv12I

        203 (gwgcw/c)

        BsaWI

        131 (w/ccggw)

        Bse1I

        155 (actgg)

        BseNI

        155 (actgg)

        BsePI

        349 (g/cgcgc)

        BseRI

        213 (gaggag)

        BsiHKAI

        203 (gwgcw/c)

        BsiI

        111 (ctcgtg)

        BsmAI

        308 (gtctc)

        BsmBI

        149 (cgtctc)

        Bsp120I

        267 (g/ggccc)

        BspMI

        123 (acctgc)

        BpmI

        170 (ctggag)

        BsaAI

        155 (yac/gtr)

        BsrBI

        164 (gagcgg)

        BsrI

        155 (actgg

        BsrSI

        155 (actgg)

        BssHII

        349 (g/cgcgc)

        BssSI

        111 (ctcgtg)

        BstZI

        338 (c/ggccg)

        BssT1I

        124 (c/cwwgg)

        BstD102I

        164 (gagcgg)

        BstDEI

        139 (c/tnag)

        BstF5I

        292 (ggatg)

        BstX2I

        108 (r/gatcy)

        BstYI

        108 (r/gatcy)

        Cfr9I

        286 (c/ccggg)

        DdeI

        139 (c/tnag)

        EagI

        338 (c/ggccg)

        EclXI

        338 (c/ggccg)

        Eco130I

        124(c/cwwgg)

        EcoT14I

        124 (c/cwwgg)

        EheI

        261 (ggc/gcc)

        ErhI

        124 (c/cwwgg)

        Esp3I

        149 (cgtctc)

        FokI

        292 (ggatg)

        HincII

        105 (gty/rac)

        HindII

        105 (gty/rac)

        HinfI

        318 (g/antc)

        HphI

        280 (ggtga)

        KasI

        261 (g/gcgcc)

        MaeIII

        244 (/gtnac)

        MboII

        261 (gaaga)

        MflI

        108 (r/gatcy)

        MroNI

        250 (g/ccggc)

        MseI

        116 (t/taa)

        MslI

        124(caynn/nnrtg)

        NaeI

        250 (gcc/ggc)

        NarI

        261 (gg/cgcc)

        NgoAIV

        250 (g/ccggc)

        NgoMI

        250 (g/ccggc)

        NspI

        104 (rcatg/y)

        PleI

        212 (gagtc)

        PpuMI

        169 (rg/gwccy)

        Psp5II

        169 (rg/gwccy)

        PspAI

        286 (c/ccggg)

        PspALI

        286 (ccc/ggg)

        PspOMI

        267 (g/ggccc)

        SfaNI

        279 (gcatc)

        SmaI

        286 (ccc/ggg)

        TfiI

        106 (g/awtc)

        Tru1I

        116 (t/taa)

        Tru9I

        116 (t/taa)

        Tsp45I

        184 (/gtsac)

        TspRI

        109 (cagtg)

        XhoII

        108 (r/gatcy)

        XmaI

        286 (c/ccggg)

        XmaIII

        338 (c/ggccg)

        77 total enzymes

        Table 2

        REase (DNase) enzymesHSV-2 genome cutting in > 400 but less 700 sites

        Enzyme name

        Genomic splices (palindrome)

        AccB1I

        403 (g/gyrcc)

        AcyI

        671(gr/cgyc)

        AfaI

        426 (gt/ac)

        AluI

        456 (ag/ct)

        Ama87I

        613 (c/ycgrg)

        AvaI

        613 (c/ycgrg)

        AvaII

        613 (g/gwcc)

        BanI

        403 (g/gyrcc)

        BanII

        520 (grgcy/c)

        BbiII

        671 (gr/cgyc)

        BbvI

        613 (gcagc)

        BcoI

        613 (c/ycgrg)

        BglI

        316 (gccnnnn/nggc)

        Bme18I

        613 (g/gwcc)

        BsaHI

        671 (gr/cgyc)

        BsaOI

        634 (cgry/cg)

        Bse118I

        428 (r/ccggy)

        Bsh1285I

        634 (cgry/cg)

        BshNI

        403 (g/gyrcc)

        BsiEI

        634 (cgry/cg)

        BsmFI

        668 (gggac)

        BsoBI

        613 (c/ycgrg)

        Bsp143I

        449 (/gatc)

        Bsp143II

        562 (rgcgc/y)

        BsrFI

        428 (r/ccggy)

        BssAI

        428 (r/ccggy)

        Bst71I

        613 (gcagc)

        BstDSI

        699 (c/crygg)

        BstH2I

        562 (rgcgc/y)

        BstMCI

        634 (cgry/cg)

        Cfr10I

        428 (r/ccggy)

        Cfr42I

        400 (ccgc/gg)

        CfrI

        698 (y/ggccr)

        Csp6I

        426 (g/tac)

        DpnI

        449 (ga/tc)

        DpnII

        449 (/gatc)

        DraII

        450 (rg/gnccy)

        DsaI

        699 (c/crygg)

        EaeI

        698 (y/ggccr)

        Eco24I

        520 (grgcy/c)

        Eco47I

        613 (g/gwcc)

        Eco52I

        338 (c/ggccg)

        Eco64I

        403 (g/gyrcc)

        Eco88I

        613 (c/ycgrg)

        EcoO109I

        450 (rg/gnccy)

        FriOI

        520 (grgcy/c)

        GsuI

        170 (ctggag)

        HaeII

        562 (rgcgc/y)

        HgiEI

        613 (g/gwcc)

        Hin1I

        671 (gr/cgyc)

        Hsp92I

        671 (gr/cgyc)

        Hsp92II

        434 (catg/)

        KspI

        400 (ccgc/gg)

        Kzo9I

        449 (/gatc)

        MaeII

        581 (a/cgt)

        MboI

        449 (/gatc)

        Msp17I

        671 (gr/cgyc)

        MspA1I

        633 (cmg/ckg)

        NdeII

        449 (/gatc)

        NlaIII

        434 (3168 catg/)

        NspBII

        633 (cmg/ckg)

        RsaI

        426 (gt/ac)

        SacII

        400 (ccgc/gg)

        Sau3AI

        449 (/gatc)

        Sfr303I

        400 (ccgc/gg)

        SinI

        613 (g/gwcc)

        SstII

        400 (ccgc/gg)

        TaqI

        503 (t/cga)

        TthHB8I

        503 (t/cga)

        69 total enzymes

        Table 3

        REase enzymes cutting HSV-2 genome in 700 or more times

        Enzyme name

        Genomic splices (palindrome)

        1BmyI*

        773 (gdgch/c)

        2Bsp1286I*+#

        773 (gdgch/c)

        3Bst2UI*+

        824 (cc/wgg)

        4BstNI*+#

        824 (cc/wgg)

        5BstOI*+

        824 (cc/wgg)

        6EcoRII*+#

        824 (/ccwgg)

        7HgaI*+#

        831 (gacgc)

        8MvaI*+#

        824 (cc/wgg)

        9SduI*+#

        773 (gdgch/c)

        *Type II restriction enzyme subtype: P; +commercially available; #Enzyme gene cloned 1–9 Source of REase: Bacillus mycoides [21], Bacillus sphaericus [22], Bacillus stearothermophilus 2U, Bacillus stearothermophilus [23], Bacillus stearothermophilus O22, Escherichia coli R245 [24], Haemophilus gallinarum [25] Micrococcus varians RFL19 [26] and Streptococcus durans RFL3[27]

        B. Modeling nano-N-9-EcoRII; a nanoparticle that may be explored to develop microbicides against HSV-2

        A model of a nanoparticle that may be explored in microbicide development was conceptualized. We based that conception on the hypothesis that "for viral genome to be rendered susceptible to a REase with potent activity against the HSV-2 genome, the naked HSV-2 genome must be brought into proximity with the REase". For purposes of this modeling, we have theoretically employed chemical two surfactants, Nonoxynol-9 and Savvy (C31G); although several other synthetic detergents with demonstrated safe profiles following repeated application in vaginal mucosa of both humans and animals such as 1.0% Savvy (C31G) [28]; and plant derivative like Praneem polyherbal suppository and gossypol may serve the purpose. Note that meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials including more than 5000 women for N-9 safety have indicated some evidence of harm through genital lesions; with N-9 not being recommended for HIV and STI prevention[29]; while no serious adverse event was attributable to SAVVY(C31G) use by a Phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial [30]. To this regard, for purposes of in-vivo viral envelope-disruption, Savvy and other surfactants with safe profiles in humans may be a better and safer option. The chemical structure and molecular weight of both N-9 and Savvy are shown in Figure 1.
        http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1742-4682-5-18/MediaObjects/12976_2008_Article_174_Fig1_HTML.jpg
        Figure 1

        This figure shows the chemical structures of nonoxynol-9 and C31G. A. Note the hydrophilic end with the hydroxyl ion at the extreme left; and the hydrophobic hydrocarbon-benzene complex. This property confers on this molecule the ability to complex with both hydrophilic (ionized) and hydrophobic molecules. The chemical formula and molecular mass of a single nonoxynol-9 molecule are respectively C33H60O10 and 616.823 g/mol. B. C31G is a 1:1 mixed Micelle of Alkyl dimethyl amine oxide and Alkyl dimethylglycine (betaine).

        We obtained the chemical formula and molecular weights of the enzyme EcoRII by using its complete gene and protein sequences [3133]. Protparam software (Expasy, Swissprot) tool was used for this modeling, as described elsewhere [34]. For details of results of the physicochemical parameters of EcoRII, see Table 4 and [see Additional file 2]. From these results, specifically the values of the anionic and cationic amino acid composition, it may be noticed that EcoRII is overall negatively charged (-52, +43; overall molecule charge is -9), providing anions that could bind free H+ in the lactic acid of "PLGA". The other measured EcoRII variables included number of atoms, amino acid composition, instability index, aliphatic index, theoretical PI, in vivo half life and grand average hydropathy (GRAVY) and are shown in Table 4. The 3-dimensional structure of EcoRII was modeled from that previously reported [35]; and is available as PDB entry 1nas6 in the EMBL protein database (see Figure 2).
        Table 4

        Physiochemical parameters of EcoRII as predicted from the amino acid sequence alignments

        Physicochemical parameter

        Value

        Number of amino acids:

        404

        Molecular Weight

        45611

        Theoretical PI

        6.10

        Total number of negatively charged residues (Asp+Glu)

        52

        Total number of positive residues (Arg+Lys)

        43

        Atomic composition:

         

           • Carbon(C)

        2053

           • Hydrogen(H)

        3205

           • Nitroge(N)

        565

           • Oxygen(O)

        393

           • Sulfur

        10

        Total number of atoms:

        6426

        Formula:

        C 2053 H 3205 N 565 O 593 S 10

        Extinction coefficients:

        47120(46870)

        Estimated half-life(hours)

         

           • (mammalian reticulocytes, in vitro)

        30 hour

           • (yeast, in vivo)

        > 20 hours

           • (Escherichia coli, in vivo)

        > 10 hours

        Instability index:

        45.04

        Aliphatic index:

        97.05

        Grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY)

        -0.183

        http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1742-4682-5-18/MediaObjects/12976_2008_Article_174_Fig2_HTML.jpg
        Figure 2

        This figure shows the deposited crystal structure of restriction endonuclease EcoRII mutant R88A in the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) Protein database (entry 1nas6). A detailed structure of the N-domain, which contains the effector-binding cleft of EcoRII with putative DNA-binding residues H36, Y41, K92, R94, E96, K97 and R98, can be found from work by Zhou et al. [34].

        For the purposes of achieving conjugation and chemical binding between either Savvy or Nonoxynol-9) and EcoRII, we further hypothesized that the aliphatic polyester poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) may suffice [35]. PLGA is a copolymer that is synthesized by random ring-opening co-polymerization of two different monomers, the cyclic dimers (1,4-dioxane-2,5-diones) of glycolic acid and lactic acid on either tin (II) 2-ethylhexanoate, tin(II) alkoxides, or aluminum isopropoxide as catalysts. Owing to its wide solubility, bio-degradability and compatibility, PLGA is used in drug delivery by the formation of nanoparticles [36]. A simplified chemical structure of PLGA is shown in Figure 3. We finally derived a likely chemical structure of a single molecule of the nanoparticles: 1) nano-N-9-EcoRII and Nano-C31G-EcoRII. Both Theses model nanoparticle structures are shown in Figure 4. We believe that such nanoparticles may be synthesized practically using a two-step emulsion of EcoRII in PLGA followed by addition of N-9 or C31G rather than polyacrylic acid (PAA) as described elsewhere [35]. Note that it has been assumed that only a single molecule of EcoRII, C31G or N-9 and PLGA will form the nanoparticle, although practically speaking, the relative proportions of the constituent molecules may vary.
        http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1742-4682-5-18/MediaObjects/12976_2008_Article_174_Fig3_HTML.jpg
        Figure 3

        The figure shows a simplified chemical structure of PGLA. X represents lactic acid while y represents glycolic acid. Notice the availability of the hydroxyl (-OH) and free hydrogen (+H) ions at lactic and glycolic extremities of the PLGA molecule respectively. This possibly accounts for diversity of PLGA solvent solubility. PLGA may thus effectively be used to complex both EcoRII and nonoxynol-9 by a two step emulsion of EcoRII first in PLGA; followed by a final emersion in nonoxynol-9.

        http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1742-4682-5-18/MediaObjects/12976_2008_Article_174_Fig4_HTML.jpg
        Figure 4

        This figure attempts to model the molecular binding of EcoRII to nonoxynol-9 or C31G (savvy) through the polyester PLGA. A. N-9 and EcoRII PLGA loaded nanoparticles: Note the orientation of the hydrogen and hydroxyl ions in the glycolic and lactic acids monomers of PLGA towards the hydroxyl and hydrogen ions in the N-9 and the REase nanoparticles model. The underlined dots signify that it is unknown which, covalent or hydrogen, bonds are involved. B. C31G and EcoRII PLGA loaded nanoparticles. Note that the chemical structure of Savvy is has been abbreviated to C31G, but is [C14H29 N(CH3)2O]A- + [C16H33 N (CH3)2CH2COO]B-.

        C. Modeling a "recombinant lactobacillus" able to attract and destroy HSV-2

        Additionally, we propose that a recombinant Lactobacillus expressing "truncated nectin-1 and EcoRII" may achieve a "divert and destroy" strategy against HSV-2. That strategy is based on two hypotheses.

        First, surface anchoring of the HSV-2 cellular receptor on the cell walls of native vaginal bacteria (and not merely secretory expression) is possible, and may realise a "divert" strategy for HSV-2 genital infection. This hypothesis is based on the following observations and conceptualizations: (i) Lactobacilli exist as a biofilm that acts as a first line of defence over the genital mucosa. This biofilm forms a potential antimicrobial barrier over the epithelia lining. (ii) Enhancing the antiviral properties of Lactobacilli has recently become a strategy for protecting underlying susceptible mucosal cells from viral tropism [3640]. Specifically, we believe that making these cells mimic "susceptible cells" may divert primary HSV-2 infection. Liu et al. [38] have recently engineered Human vaginal Lactobacilli for surface expression of two domain CD 4 using native sequences of a defined length upstream of the unique C-terminal LPQTG cell wall sorting signal and the positively charged C-terminus in a Lactobacillus-based expression system. The modified L. jensenii displayed 2D CD4 molecules that were uniformly distributed on the bacterial surfaces, and recognized by a conformation dependent anti-CD4 antibody, suggesting that the expressed proteins adopted a native conformation. Such Lactobacillus-based surface expression systems, with potential broad applicability, represent a major step toward developing an inexpensive, yet durable approach to topical microbicides for mitigation of heterosexual transmission of HIV and other mucosally transmitted viral pathogens [38]. Heterologous proteins have been expressed on the surfaces of other Gram-positive bacteria via the sortase23-catalyzed cell wall anchoring mechanism [41], including 5 Streptococcus gordonii, Lactobacillus paracasei and Staphylococcus carnosus [4145]. Assuming that this approach can be used to anchor the HSV-2 surface receptor on their cell walls, these bacteria may "mimic" susceptible underlying cells and become infected with HSV-2. This is what we refer to as the "divert strategy". Although HSV-2 attachment and entry into epithelial cells is mediated through a chain of events, a member of the immunoglobulin (Ig) superfamily closely related to the poliovirus receptor (Pvr), PRR1 (also known as HveC, CD111, CLPED1, ED4, HIgR, HVEC, MGC142031, MGC16207, OFC7, PRR, PRR1, PVRR, PVRR1, SK-12, nectin-1), has been found to be the most effective mediator of HSV-2 attachment and viral entry. HveC also mediates the entry of other alphaherpesviruses [4652]. Krummenacher et al. [52] have cloned and expressed a "truncated" form of HveC (HveCt) in non-permissive insect cell lines (Spodoptera frugiperda or Sf9) using plasmid pCK285 [46, 52] to purify soluble proteins. Given that both CD4 and HveCt are members of the immunoglobulin (Ig) superfamily, we predict that cell wall anchored truncated nectin-1 (HveCt) can be expressed in Lactobacillus using a modified form of plasmid pCK285 and the approach recently devised by Liu et al. [38]. Such additional modifications are necessary because the promoter previously used (polyhedrin) to express HveCt in insect cells is specific for baculovirus [46, 52]; a construct using a bacterial promoter active in Lactobacillus is needed. For instance, the P23 promoter from Lactococcus lactis created by PCR amplification with the primers 5'-GTGGAGCTCCCCGAAAAGCCCTGACAACCC-3' and 5'-GGAAACACGCTAGCACTAACTTCATT-3', as described by Liu et al., may suffice [38].

        Second, we have hypothesized that by further modifying these truncated nectin-1(or HveC)-expressing lactobacilli to express restriction enzymes with potent genome slicing potential such as the EcoRII shown here, integration of the HSV-2 genome into them can be halted (through the disruption or destruction of its genome). This further modification would allow for a "divert and destroy" strategy similar to that being explored in HIV [3840]. It is likely that EcoRII can be expressed in Lactobacilli because a previous genome-wide analysis of the Lac. Plantinuum protein database revealed the presence of Mtase and REase activities derived from Staphylococcus aureus [37]. Plasmid-mediated transfer of R-M activity is common in bacteria [19, 20], and because EcoRII is originally encoded on a plasmid rather than the E. coli chromosome [24], recombinant transfer of plasmid R245 to Lactobacilli is likely achievable. The additional "destroy" conception is suggested by the approach that bacteria use to resist tropism bacteriophages [17, 18]. The resultant model recombinant Lactobacillus has been dubbed "xREPLAB-tN1".

        Discussion

        This work extends the concept of viral genome slicing (GSX), previously described for human retroviruses as a module for research and development of novel antivirals at the genome level [17], to HSV-2. Because HSV-2 has been noted as a major cofactor in the sexual acquisition and transmission of HIV-1 [515], preventing HSV-2 infection in this way may be a potential strategy for reducing the sexual transmission and acquisition of HIV-1.

        Here, we detail the first focused effort to identify REases with potential splicing activity against the HSV-2 genome (more than 700 sites) – BmyI, Bsp1286I, Bst2UI, BstNI, BstOI, EcoRII, HgaI, MvaI and SduI – which may be applied to research and the development of HSV-2 biomedical prevention strategies. All 9 of these REase are Type II restriction enzyme subtype P, derived respectively from the bacteria Bacillus mycoides [21], Bacillus sphaericus [22], Bacillus stearothermophilus 2U, Bacillus stearothermophilus [23], Bacillus stearothermophilus O22, Escherichia coli R245 [24], Haemophilus gallinarum [25]Micrococcus varians RFL19 [26] and Streptococcus durans RFL3 [27] (see Table 3; details of other cutting enzymes and frequency of splices are shown in Tables 1, 2 and [Additional file 1]). However, it should be noted that some of these enzymes are isoschizomers that are not significantly active under human physiological conditions. For instance, the three REases derived from Bacillus stearothermophilus have optimal activity at 60°C [2123]. Such characteristics make them impractical for use in the design of microbicides. Therefore, not all these suggested restriction enzymes may actually be successfully applied in both approaches modeled. The enzyme EcoRII was selected because: (1) it is metabolically stable at temperature ranges inclusive of normal human body temperature(see Table 4 and Additional file 2) [24]; (2) its source, the bacterium Escherichia coli, is similarly a Gram positive bacteria of which the cell wall anchoring system can be modified to express heterologous proteins as in Lactobacillus strains; (3) it exhibits one of the highest slicing potentials against the HSV-2 genome (a strategy that may be beneficial in avoiding spontaneous ligation-see tables 1, 2 and 3); (4) The REase is encoded on plasmids rather than the bacterial chromosome, making its transfer to other bacterial strains possible.

        Several questions remain to be answered about the two proposed models. However, many of them can be addressed fully through in situ experimentation rather than modeling approaches. In both proposed models, it is possible to question whether the additional modifications – (i) cross linking EcoRII to N-9 or C31G (ii) expressing EcoRII in HveCt-expressing Lactobacilli – are relevant. For instance, while it is reasonable to propose that the EcoRII and N-9 or C31G PLGA-loaded nanoparticles may disrupt the viral envelope and possibly the viral capsid, bringing the naked genome into contact with the REase, one could nevertheless argue that the virus is no longer infectious by the time the genome is released from the virion, which would make the REase redundant. A similar argument could be made for the Lactobacillus approach. Once the virus has infected Lactobacillus, it cannot infect the vaginal epithelium, so destruction of the genome by REase appears unnecessary. Moreover, the N-9 comprised nanoparticles are used here for theoretical purposes, as their use in humans is bound to raise safety concerns emanating from the previous evidence of mucosal irritation and enhancement of both HIV and STI transmission [28]. Never the less, in the absence of experimental evidence based on such nanoparticles, one could still argue their case from the fact that chemotherapeutic agents with noted in-vivo toxicity have been observed to exhibit extensively reduced such adverse effects when complexed into nanoparticles. For instance, DiJoseph et al have recently shown that conjugation of calicheamicin to rituximab with an acid-labile or acid stable linker vastly enhances its growth inhibitory activity against BCL in vitro, has no deleterious effect on the effector functional activity of rituximab, and exhibited greater anti-tumor activity against B cell lymphoma(BCL) xenografts and improved survival of mice with disseminated BCL over that of unconjugated rituximab. Such demonstrated reduced adverse effects of a calicheamicin immunoconjugate of rituximab demonstrate the safety advantage nanoparticles confer to initially unsafe bioactive agents [53].

        In the case of the proposed nanoparticle model, it is not fully known by which bonds the REase will combine with the polymer (whether convalent or hydrogen bonds, as shown in Figure 4). Such bonds would presumably influence or affect the pattern of release of the components (covalent bonds are stronger and harder to break than hydrogen bonds). Moreover, the chemical models of "N-9 or C13G and EcoRII" PLGA-loaded nanoparticles shown in Figure 4 propose a single nonoxynol-9 or C31G molecule per REase. However, that may not be the case in the resultant nanoparticles (in situ evaluation of the composition of the nanoparticles is required). In addition, whether the molar concentrations of the respective active ingredients (N-9 or C31G and EcoRII) are sufficient to destabilize the viral envelope and genome, respectively, can only be decided by in situ experiments. Because of its previously demonstrated unsafe profiles in humans [29], any attempts to employ N-9 in such nanoparticles strategies are likely to exploit much lesser concentrations so as to achieve safety. In so doing, that may compromise efficacy for viral envelope disruption. Further still, it is not known whether such polymerization may affect enzyme or surfactant activity. Enzyme activities depend on active site conformations, and any changes in the 3D structure will probably influence activity. We have assumed that, since REases are stored in the simple ester construct glycerol, and PLGA is in essence a poly-ester, EcoRII may remain active despite copolymerization. Also, in the proposed nanoparticle model, the involvement of the hydrophilic hydroxyl group of N-9 or C31G or any other detergents in the interaction with PLGA could possibly affect the amphiphatic properties required to disrupt the viral envelope and capsid.

        Irrespective of the answers to these questions, such nanoparticles would have advantages of their own. For instance: (i) they help to increase the stability of drugs and possess useful release-control properties; (ii) they offer an increased surface area of action for the drug iii) and enhance efficacy considerably; thereby involve use of lower concentrations of the bioactive agent relative to when used alone [5355]. Nano-properties i-iii may avail one reason for experimental re-trial of agents like N-9 which has been previously found unsafe for use to prevent HIV or other STI [29]. For such nanoparticles to be applicable in human conditions, it is imperative that we not only determine their size and Zeta potential but safety. In the past, dynamic laser light scattering from the Malvern Zetasizer 3000HAs system (Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK) at 25°C at a 90° angle using PCS 1.61 software has been used to determine both nanoparticle size and Zeta potential [54, 55].

        The "live microbicide" model also raises unique questions that can only be answered experimentally. First, there is still a need for in situ experiments to evaluate the efficacy of surface anchored HveCt expression by xREPLAB-tN1 in the same way that Liu et al have for 2D CD4 [38]. Previous expression of HveCt in insect line lines does not guarantee that it will be successfully expressed in Lactobacillus. Therefore, the efficiency of xREPLAB-tN1 engineering in respective to HveCt surface expression needs be determined by either (i) Partial purification of HveCt(tN1), (ii) Western analysis of HveCt expression in xREPLAB-N1, (iii) growth phase evaluation of HveCt productivity, or (iv) HSV-2 gD binding assays using whole-cell Lactobacillus extracts and affinity-purified anti-nectin1 antibodies (R7), as has been done elsewhere [38, 52]. In situ experiments are also required to evaluate potential EcoRII expression, say by Phage (λ) DNA digestion assays following REase elution from L. jensenni whole cell extracts using electrophoresis, as described elsewhere [56]. Lastly, testing the in vitro safety and efficacy of "xREPLAB-tN1" is mandatory prior to clinical application in humans. We have found no example of a eukaryotic virus infecting a bacterium, so it cannot be guaranteed outright that surface anchoring of HveCt would enable HSV-2 to be diverted into Lactobacilli.

        Finally, many genomes of bacteriophages contain unusual nucleic acids bases [19, 20]. For example, the T-even coliphage DNA contains not cytosine but 5-hydroxymethylcytosine, and most of the hydroxymethylcytosine residues in these DNAs are glycosylated as well [20]. The genome of the B. subtilis phage contains a diversity of thymidine replacements, including uracil, 5-hydroxymethylcytosine, glycosylated or phosphorylated 5 uracil and alpha-glutamyl thymine. These unusual bases serve to render the phage genome resistant to degradation by host restriction enzymes [19, 20]. It is likely that HSV-2 may become resistant to REase cleavage through similar variations in the viral genomes. This is a likely mechanism for the evolution of resistance to REase-based microbicides. Moreover, R-M systems do not operate with 100% efficiency, and a small number of phages have been noted to survive and produce progeny in bacteria [19, 20]. This too may be a shortcoming of REase-based microbicides. We believe that such resistance may be overcome in future by altering the specificity of EcoRII. This concept is based on the fact that among R-M systems of the same class, transfer of the hsdS specificity gene (or protein) occurs naturally and serves to alter the specificity of the "R-M progeny" [19, 20]. Similar alterations may be achieved through recombinant engineering, which implies application of the other 8 REases with potent cleavage potential against the HSV-2 genome, but with characteristics that make them less than ideal for use in either proposed model. Again, whether the transfer of specificity subunits from REase such as those derived from the Bacillus spp. would entail the persistence of unfavorable characteristics, such as functioning best at temperature ranges outside the normal human physiological range, can only be answered by experiments in situ.

        Conclusion

        We identify the REase EcoRII as a potential ingredient of HSV-2 microbicides. Modeled for the first time ever are (i) a nanoparticle for use in research and development of microbicides against HSV-2, and (ii) a "live microbicide" for diverting primary HSV-2 infection from genital mucosal cells coupled to genome disruption. Surfactants with safer profiles may form better candidates for conjugating to EcoRII.

        Methods

        A. Identification of REase with potential activity against HSV-2 genome

        Design

        In silco genome-wide palindromics

        Materials and software

        the whole genome of HSV-2 (PAN = NCBI| NC_001798|); 289 REases and the bioinformatics software Webcutter2 http://​rna.​lundberg.​gu.​se/​cutter2/​

        Interventions

        we searched for genome splicing sites in a linear pattern in order to recognize 6 or more base-pair palindromes compatible with recognition sites of the 289 REase.

        Measured Variables

        cutting enzymes; frequency of splices and specificity palindrome

        B. Modeling of the chemical bonding of the nanoparticle nano-N-9-EcoRII

        B1. Chemical structure of nonoxynol-9: Was modeled from that available literature on surfactant groups of microbicides [29]. The Chemical structure of Savvy C31G was also modeled from that available in literature [28, 30]

        B2. Physicochemical properties of EcoRII

        Design

        In silco Proteomics

        Material and Software

        Protparam Software http://​www.​expasy.​ch/​tools/​protparam.​html; and the EcoRII enzyme accession number = SWISS PROT |P14633|

        Interventions

        Direct feeding of amino acid sequences of EcoRII into the protparam interface

        Measured variables

        chemical formula of EcoRII and its possible molecular structure Other measured variables included number of atoms, amino acid composition, instability index, aliphatic index, theoretical PI, in-vivo half life and grand average hydropathy (GRAVY).

        B3. The likely 3-D structure of EcoRII was obtained from the EMBL protein database using the entry number 1nas6 http://​www.​ebi.​ac.​uk/​pdbsum/​1NA6

        C. Modeling of a recombinant lactobacillus for diverting primary mucosal HSV infection

        C1. Primary accession of CD258 antigen; also known as tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 14, which acts as herpesvirus entry mediator-ligand and nectin-1 (also CD111 antigen; herpes virus entry mediator C) were obtained to show that proteins are readily recognized.

        C2. A review of the strategies for modifying the plasmid vectors (i) pLEM7, (ii) pOSEL144 pOSEL651, (iii) pVT-Bac, (iv) PBG38 and (v) pCK285 to generate super plasmids for expression of heterologous proteins in Lactobacillus was done as described elsewhere [38, 52].

        Accession Numbers

        HSV-2 whole genome = NCBI| NC_001798|; EcoRII enzyme protein sequence = SWISS PROT |P14633|; HVEM ligand(aka CD258 antigen) primary accession number(PAN) = SWISSPROT = |O43557|; nectin-1(aka CD111 antigen) PAN = SWISSPROT|Q15223|, EcoRII mutant R88A 3-D structure PDB entry = EMBL |1nas6|

        Availability & requirements

        Declarations

        Acknowledgements

        The authors received no specific funding for this work. W.M. has in the past, however, received scholarly grant support in this line of study from Virology Educ., the global AIDS vaccine Initiative, Microbicide2008, and the Bill and Melinda Gates AIDS foundation through Keystone.

        Authors’ Affiliations

        (1)
        Restrizymes Biotherapeutics Uganda Limited,
        (2)
        Restrizymes Corporation-
        (3)
        Division of Molecular Biology, Dept of Microbiology,, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University,
        (4)
        Division of Human and Molecular Genetics,, Dept of Pathology College of Health Sciences Makerere University,

        References

        1. UNAIDS: Report on the global HIV-AIDS epidemic. 2006
        2. Royce RA, Sena A, Cates W, Cohen MS: Sexual transmission of HIV. N Engl J Med. 1997, 336: 1072-1078. 10.1056/NEJM199704103361507.View ArticlePubMed
        3. Anderson RM: Transmission dynamics of sexually transmitted infections. Sexually transmitted diseases. Edited by: Holmes KK, Sparling PF, Mårdh P-A, Lemon SM, Stamm WE, Piot P, et al. 1999, New York: McGraw-Hill, Chapter 3: 25-37. 3
        4. Hillier SL: The vaginal microbial ecosystem and resistance to HIV. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 1998, 14 (Suppl 1): S17-21.PubMed
        5. Wald A, Link K: Risk of human immunodeficiency virus infection in herpes simplex virus type 2-seropositive persons: a meta-analysis. J Infect Dis. 2002, 185 (1): 45-52. 10.1086/338231.View ArticlePubMed
        6. Fleming DT, Wasserheit JN: From epidemiological synergy to public health policy and practice: the contribution of other sexually transmitted diseases to sexual transmission of HIV infection. Sex Transm Infect. 1999, 75 (1): 3-17.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
        7. del Mar Pujades Rodriguez M, Obasi A, Mosha F, Todd J, Brown D, Changalucha J, Mabey D, Ross D, Grosskurth H, Hayes R: Herpes simplex virus type 2 infection increases HIV incidence: a prospective study in rural Tanzania. Aids. 2002, 16 (3): 451-462. 10.1097/00002030-200202150-00018.View ArticlePubMed
        8. Gray RH, Wawer MJ, Brookmeyer R, Sewankambo NK, Serwadda D, Wabwire-Mangen F, Lutalo T, Li X, vanCott T, Quinn TC: Probability of HIV-1 transmission per coital act in monogamous, heterosexual, HIV-1-discordant couples in Rakai, Uganda. Lancet. 2001, 357 (9263): 1149-1153. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04331-2.View ArticlePubMed
        9. Margolis DM, Rabson AB, Straus SE, Ostrove JM: Transactivation of the HIV-1 LTR by HSV-1 immediate-early genes. Virology. 1992, 186 (2): 788-791. 10.1016/0042-6822(92)90048-T.View ArticlePubMed
        10. Albrecht MA, DeLuca NA, Byrn RA, Schaffer PA, Hammer SM: The herpes simplex virus immediate-early protein, ICP4, is required to potentiate replication of human immunodeficiency virus in CD4+ lymphocytes. J Virol. 1989, 63 (5): 1861-1868.PubMed CentralPubMed
        11. Cunningham AL, Turner RR, Miller AC, Para MF, Merigan TC: Evolution of recurrent herpes simplex lesions. An immunohistologic study. J Clin Invest. 1985, 75 (1): 226-233. 10.1172/JCI111678.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
        12. Fauci AS: The human immunodeficiency virus: infectivity and mechanisms of pathogenesis. Science. 1988, 239 (4840): 617-622. 10.1126/science.3277274.View ArticlePubMed
        13. Zhu ZH, Chen SS, Huang AS: Phenotypic mixing between human immunodeficiency virus and vesicular stomatitis virus or herpes simplex virus. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1990, 3 (3): 215-219.PubMed
        14. Calistri A, Parolin C, Pizzato M, Calvi P, Giaretta I, Palu G: Herpes simplex virus chronically infected human T lymphocytes are susceptible to HIV-1 superinfection and support HIV-1 pseudotyping. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1999, 21 (2): 90-98.PubMed
        15. LeGoff J, Bouhlal H, Lecerf M, Klein C, Hocini H, Si-Mohamed A, Muggeridge M, Bélec L: LHSV-2- and HIV-1- permissive cell lines co-infected by HSV-2 and HIV-1 co-replicate HSV-2 and HIV-1 without production of HSV-2/HIV-1 pseudotype particles. Virology J. 2007, 4: 2-10.1186/1743-422X-4-2. doi:10.1186/1743-422X-4-2.View Article
        16. WHO, UNAIDS: Herpes simplex virus type 2. Programmatic and research priorities in developing countries. 2001
        17. Wayengera M: Pre-Integration gene slicing (PRINT-GSX) as an alternate or complementary gene therapy modem to RNA interference. J Appl Biol Sci. 2008, 1 (2): 56-63.
        18. Wayengera M, Byarugaba W, Kajumbula H: Frequency and site mapping of HIV-1/SIVcpz, HIV-2/SIVsmm and Other SIV gene sequence cleavage by various bacteria restriction enzymes: Precursors for a novel HIV inhibitory product. Afr J Biotechnol. 2007, 6 (10): 1225-1232.
        19. Nelson M, McClelland M: Site specific methylation effect on DNA modification methyltransferases and restriction endonucleases. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991, 19: 2045-2071.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
        20. Murray N: Type 1 Restriction systems. Sophisticated molecular machines (a legacy of Bertani and Weigle). Microbial Mol Biol Rev. 2002, 64: 412-434. 10.1128/MMBR.64.2.412-434.2000.View Article
        21. Wagner E, Schmitz GG, Kaluza K, Jarsch M, Gotz F, Kessler C: BmyI, a novel SduI isoschizomer from Bacillus mycoides recognizing 5'-GDGCH/C-3'. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990, 18: 3088-10.1093/nar/18.10.3088.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
        22. Shibata T, Ikawa S, Kim C, Ando T: Site-specific Deoxyribonucleases in Bacillus subtilis and other Bacillus strains. J Bacteriol. 1976, 128: 473-476.PubMed CentralPubMed
        23. Huang L-H, Farnet CM, Ehrlich KC, Ehrlich M: Digestion of highly modified bacteriophage DNA by restriction endonucleases. Nucleic Acids Res. 1982, 10: 1579-1591. 10.1093/nar/10.5.1579.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
        24. Kosykh VG: Escherichia coli K-12 plasmid R245 controlling EcoRII restriction and DNA modification. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR. 1978, 238: 1227-1230.PubMed
        25. Sugisaki H: Nucleotide sequence of the gene of HgaI restriction endonuclease. Bull Inst Chem Res Kyoto Univ. 1993, 71: 338-342.
        26. Butkus V, Klimasauskas S, Kersulyte D, Vaitkevicius D, Lebionka A, Janulaitis A: Investigation of restriction-modification enzymes from M. varians RFL19 with a new type of specificity toward modification of substrate. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985, 13: 5727-5746. 10.1093/nar/13.16.5727.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
        27. Janulaitis A, Marcinkeviciene L, Petrusyte M, Mironov A: A new sequence-specific endonuclease from Streptococcus durans. FEBS Lett. 1981, 134: 172-174. 10.1016/0014-5793(81)80594-7.View ArticlePubMed
        28. Patton DL, Sweeney YT, Balkus JE, Hillier SL: Vaginal and rectal topical microbicide development: safety and efficacy of 1.0% Savvy (C31G) in the pigtailed macaque. Sex Transm Dis. 2006, 33 (11): 691-695. 10.1097/01.olq.0000216022.18321.d3.View ArticlePubMed
        29. Wilkinson D, Tholandi M, Ramjee G, Rutherford GW: Nonoxynol-9 spermicide for prevention of vaginally acquired HIV and other sexually transmitted infections: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials including more than 5000 women. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002, 2: 613-7. 10.1016/S1473-3099(02)00396-1.View ArticlePubMed
        30. Feldblum PJ, Adeiga A, Bakare R, Wevill S, Lendvay A, Obadaki F, Olayemi MO, Wang L, Nanda K, Rountree W: SAVVY vaginal gel (C31G) for prevention of HIV infection: a randomized controlled trial in Nigeria. PLoS ONE. 2008, 3 (1): e1474-10.1371/journal.pone.0001474.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
        31. Bhagwat AS, Johnson B, Weule K, Roberts RJ: Primary sequence of the EcoRII endonuclease and properties of its fusions with beta-galactosidase. J Biol Chem. 1990, 265: 767-773.PubMed
        32. Kossykh VG, Repyk AV, Kaliman AV, Bur'Yanov YI: Nucleotide sequence of the EcoRII restriction endonuclease gene. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1989, 1009: 290-292.View ArticlePubMed
        33. Kossykh VG, Repyk AV, Kaliman AV, Bur'Yanov YI, Baev AA: Primary structure of the gene of restriction endonuclease EcoRII. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR. 1989, 308: 1497-1499.
        34. Gasteiger E, Hoogland C, Gattiker , Duvaud S, Wilkins MR, Appel RD, Bairoch A: Protein Identification and Analysis Tools on the ExPASy Server. The Proteomics Protocols Handbook. Edited by: Walker JM. 2005, Humana Press, 571-607.View Article
        35. Zhou XE, Wang Y, Reuter M, Mücke M, Krüger DH, Meehan EJ, Chen L: Crystal structure of type IIE restriction endonuclease EcoRII reveals an autoinhibition mechanism by a novel effector-binding fold. J Mol Biol. 2004, 335 (1): 307-319. 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.10.030.View ArticlePubMed
        36. Astete CE, Sabliov CM: Synthesis and characterization of PLGA nanoparticles. J Biomaterials Sci – Polymer Edition. 2006, 17 (3): 247-289. 10.1163/156856206775997322.View ArticlePubMed
        37. Wayengera M: A recombinant lactobacillus strain expressing genes coding for restriction enzymes cleaving the HIV genomes for use as a live microbicide strategy against heterosexual transmission of HIV. Afr J Biotechnol. 2007, 6 (15): 1750-1756.
        38. Liu X, Lagenaur LA, Lee PP, Xu Q: Engineering Human Vaginal Lactobacillus for Surface Expression of Two-Domain CD4. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008, 74 (15): 4626-4635. 10.1128/AEM.00104-08. doi:10.1128/AEM.00104-08.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
        39. Wayengera M: xREPLAB: A recombinant lactobacillus strain producing restriction enzymes with potent activity against HIV proviral DNA as a Live Microbicide Strategy. AIDS vaccine. 2007, Washington, Seattle, Aug 20–23, P05-01.
        40. Wayengera M: Diverting primary HIV entry and replication to vaginal commensal lactobacillus expressing R-M nucleic enzymatic peptides with potent activity at cleaving proviral DNA as a novel HIV live microbicide strategy. Microbicide New Delhi. Abs-10-2008 Feb 23–28
        41. Navarre WW, Schneewind O: Surface proteins of gram positive bacteria and mechanisms of their targeting to the cell wall envelope. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999, 63: 174-229.PubMed CentralPubMed
        42. Beninati C, Oggioni MR, Boccanera M, Spinosa MR, Maggi T, Conti S, Magliani W, De Bernardis F, Teti G, Cassone A, Pozzi G, Polonelli L: Therapy of mucosal candidiasis by expression of an anti-idiotype in human commensal bacteria. Nat Biotechnol. 2000, 18: 1060-1064. 10.1038/80250.View ArticlePubMed
        43. Giomarelli B, Provvedi R, Meacci F, Maggi T, Medaglini D, Pozzi G, Mori T, McMahon JB, Gardella R, Boyd MR: The microbicide cyanovirin-N expressed on the surface of commensal bacterium Streptococcus gordonii captures HIV-1. AIDS. 2002, 16: 1351-1356. 10.1097/00002030-200207050-00006.View ArticlePubMed
        44. Kruger C, Hu Y, Pan Q, Marcotte H, Hultberg A, Delwar D, Van Dalen PJ, Pouwels PH, Leer RJ, Kelly CG, Van Dollenweerd C, Ma JK, Hammarstrom L: In situ delivery of passive immunity by lactobacilli producing single-chain antibodies. Nat Biotechnol. 2002, 20: 702-706. 10.1038/nbt0702-702.View ArticlePubMed
        45. Pant N, Hultberg A, Zhao Y, Svensson L, Pan-Hammarstrom Q, Johansen K, Pouwels PH, Ruggeri FM, Hermans P, Frenken L, Boren T, Marcotte H, Hammarstrom L: Lactobacilli expressing variable domain of llama heavy-chain antibody fragments (lactobodies) confer protection against rotavirus-1 induced diarrhea. J Infect Dis. 2006, 194: 1580-1588. 10.1086/508747.View ArticlePubMed
        46. Geraghty RJ, Krummenacher C, Eisenberg RJ, Cohen GH, Spear PG: Entry of alphaherpesviruses mediated by poliovirus receptor related protein 1 and poliovirus receptor. Science. 1998, 280: 1618-1620. 10.1126/science.280.5369.1618.View ArticlePubMed
        47. Lopez MF, Eberlé F, Mattei MG, Gabert J, Birg F, Bardin C, Maroc P, Dubreuil P: Complementary DNA characterization and chromosomal localization of a human gene related to the poliovirus receptor-encoding gene. Gene. 1995, 155: 261-265. 10.1016/0378-1119(94)00842-G.View ArticlePubMed
        48. Eberlé F, Dubreuil P, Mattei M-G, Devilard E, Lopez M: The human PRR2 gene, related to the poliovirus receptor gene (PVR), is the true homolog of the murine MPH gene. Gene. 1995, 159: 267-272. 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00180-E.View ArticlePubMed
        49. Warner MS, Martinez W, Geraghty RJ, Montgomery RI, Whitbeck JC, Xu R, Eisenberg RJ, Cohen GH, Spear PG: A cell surface protein with herpesvirus entry activity (HveB) confers susceptibility to infection by herpes simplex virus type 2, mutants of herpes simplex virus type 1 and pseudorabies virus. Virology. 1998, 246 (1): 179-89. 10.1006/viro.1998.9218.View ArticlePubMed
        50. Aoki J, Koike S, Asou H, Ise I, Suwa H, Tanaka T, Miyasaka M, Nomoto A: Mouse homolog of poliovirus receptor-related gene 2 product, mPRR2, mediates homophilic cell aggregation. Exp Cell Res. 1997, 235: 374-384. 10.1006/excr.1997.3685.View ArticlePubMed
        51. Subramanian RP, Geraghty RJ: Herpes simplex virus type 1 mediates fusion through a hemifusion intermediate by sequential activity of glycoproteins D, H, L, and B. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007, 104 (8): 2903-2908. 10.1073/pnas.0608374104.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
        52. Krummenacher C, Nicola AV, Whitbeck JC, Lou H, Hou W, Lambris JD, Geraghty RJ, Spear PG, Cohen GH, Eisenberg RJ: Herpes simplex virus glycoprotein D can bind to poliovirus receptor-related protein 1 or herpesvirus entry mediator, two structurally unrelated mediators of virus entry. J Virol. 1998, 72 (9): 7064-7074.PubMed CentralPubMed
        53. DiJoseph JF, Dougher MM, Armellino DC, Kalyandrug L, Kunz A, Boghaert ER: CD20-specific antibody-targeted chemotherapy of non-Hodgkin's B-cell lymphoma using calicheamicin-conjugated rituximab. Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy. 2007, 57 (7): 1107-1117. 10.1007/s00262-006-0260-5.View Article
        54. Nam SH, Nam HY, Joo RJ, Baek IS, Park J: Curcumin-Loaded PLGA Nanoparticles Coating onto Metal Stent by EPD. Bull Korean Chem Soc. 2007, 28 (3): 397-402.View Article
        55. Betancourt T, Brown B, Brannon-Peppas L: Doxorubicin-lodaed PLGA nanoparticles by nanoprecipitation: preparation, charcterisation and in-vitro evaluation. Nanomedicine. 2007, 2 (2): 219-10.2217/17435889.2.2.219.View ArticlePubMed
        56. Lepikhov K, Tchernov A, Zheleznaja L, Matvienko N, Walter J, Trautner TA: Characterization of the type IV restriction modification system Bsp LU11III from Bacillus sp. LU11. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 15: 4691-4698. 10.1093/nar/29.22.4691.View Article

        Copyright

        © Wayengera et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

        This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.