Open Access

Animal evolution and atmospheric pO2: is there a link between gradual animal adaptation to terrain elevation due to Ural orogeny and survival of subsequent hypoxic periods?

Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling201411:47

https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4682-11-47

Received: 8 March 2014

Accepted: 12 October 2014

Published: 22 October 2014

Abstract

Considering evolution of terrestrial animals as something happening only on flat continental plains seems wrong. Many mountains have arisen and disappeared over the geologic time scale, so in all periods some areas of high altitude existed, with reduced oxygen pressure (pO2) and increased aridity. During orogeny, animal species of the raising terrain can slowly adapt to reduced oxygen levels.

This review proposes that animal evolution was often driven by atmospheric oxygen availability. Transitions of insect ancestors and amphibians out of water are here interpreted as events forced by the lack of oxygen in shallow and warm water during Devonian. Hyperoxia during early Carboniferous allowed giant insects to be predators of lowlands, forcing small amphibians to move to higher terrains, unsuitable to large insects due to reduced pO2. In arid mountainous habitats, ascended animals evolved in early reptiles with more efficient lungs and improved circulation. Animals with alveolar lungs became the mammalian ancestors, while those with respiratory duct lungs developed in archosaurs. In this interpretation, limb precursors of wings and pneumatised bones might have been adaptations for moving on steep slopes.

Ural mountains have risen to an estimated height of 3000 m between 318 and 251 Mya. The earliest archosaurs have been found on the European Ural side, estimated 275 Myr old. It is proposed that Ural orogeny slowly elevated several highland habitats within the modern Ural region to heights above 2500 m. Since this process took near 60 Myr, animals in these habitats fully to adapted to hypoxia.

The protracted P-Tr hypoxic extinction event killed many aquatic and terrestrial animals. Devastated lowland areas were repopulated by mammaliaformes that came down from mountainous areas. Archosaurs were better adapted to very low pO2, so they were forced to descend to the sea level later when the lack of oxygen became severe. During the Triassic period, when the relative content of O2 reduced to near 12%, archosaurs prevailed as only animals that could cope with profound hypoxia at the sea level. Their diverse descendants has become dominant terrestrial animals, until the K-Pg extinction due to meteor impact.

Keywords

Isolated habitatsP-Tr extinctionK-Pg extinctionDevonian extinctionAmphibian evolutionInsect evolutionArchosaur evolutionMammalian sex chromosomes

Introduction

General process of animal life adaptations to an ever-changing planet cannot be understood without a complex interplay of animal physiology and prevailing climate features. Extremely slow climate changes, such as orogeny due to plate tectonics also need to be incorporated. This combined approach is analogous to the “escalation hypothesis” [1], based on the idea that successful species with traits that keep them numerous and viable under static conditions, can become more endangered during the dynamics of an extinction event then some marginal and less adapted animals. A consequence is that ecological opportunity probably played a role at certain points along the lineage of mammals [2].

In a recent theoretic paper [3], a hypothesis is put forward that the occurrence of homeothermy can be understood only consequently of a long evolution process that lasted more than 50 Myr. Here presented interpretation goes further in that direction, with the idea that during several periods of animal evolution altered by hypoxic events, animals adapted to high altitude habitats could survive through migration to areas closer to the sea level. Similar to the recently published hypothesis considering the K-Pg extinction [3], here presented interpretation is based on the assumption that all physiological traits need long time to evolve and nothing happens in few generations. If no animal of a certain species has the required surviving feature, there will probably be no survivors.

Basic assumptions behind the proposed interpretation

Considering evolution of terrestrial animals as something happening only on flat continental plains seems wrong. Due to continuous orogeny, many mountains have arisen and disappeared over the geologic time scale, so in all geologic periods some areas are near the sea-level, while other areas are much higher. Although the O2 volume percent remains the same, areas of higher altitudes are under lower oxygen pressure (pO2) and usually less humid. This means that during any significant orogeny, animal species of the raising terrain can slowly adapt to reduced oxygen levels. This setting allows parallel evolutions of similar animals in habitats separated by altitude, leading to a stratified biosphere with different animal worlds at the sea level, in low or in high mountains.

Beside changes in CO2 levels, two great extinctions seem directly related to the altered oxygen availability. The older is the late Devonian extinction period ending with a hypoxic Hangenberg event (est. 358.9 ± 0.4 Mya) that has badly affected marine and terrestrial habitats and left an anoxic black shale layer with overlying sandstone deposits [4]. The more recent is the large Permian–Triassic extinction event (some 251 Mya), so severe that the animal world required millions of years to recover.

Beside these abrupt hypoxic extinctions, animal evolution was also affected by slow accumulation of atmospheric oxygen, particularly during Carboniferous period when combination of high O2 and low CO2 resulted in cooler and drier climates.

The atmospheric O2 pressure driven animal evolution

Insects as first terrestrial animals

Terrestrial life started with first plants near the coastal line. At that period, most of the oxygen was produced by the plant life in ocean were all animals lived. The atmospheric O2 level was low and oxygen availability depended almost entirely on diffusion from the ocean.

Insects, as the first terrestrial animals are assumed to have developed from early Crustaceans during early to middle Devonian, probably more than 400 Mya [5]. It can be only speculated what made insects the first terrestrial animals. The first step might have happened when some Crustacean survived in an isolated lake of increased acidity by using pure chitin in building exoskeletons. These early ancestors of insects were forced to remain in water up to the moment when early terrestrial plants have become so abundant to act as a new important source of oxygen. Then the atmospheric O2 started to diffuse into the superficial water layer, allowing ancestors of insects to dwell near the water surface. Oxygen abundance and lack of air breathing predators made these small and lightweight creatures terrestrial animals. This process must have taken many generations until some of them became able to move on the water surface, or to breathe air through their thin exoskeletons. Their descendants have developed small holes in the chitinous exoskeleton, so the formation of tracheas was probably the next step toward larger and more capable insects.

The late Devonian phase: hypoxia and emergence of teraphods

The late Devonian extinction event is possibly related to the development of teraphods. Before the extinction, the land near the coast line and along rivers had been already colonized by plants and insects. When insects invaded land in Devonian, the average O2 air content was near 16%. Since only small insects survived the Triassic nadir with protracted periods of only 12% of oxygen [6, 7], it can be assumed that the share of atmospheric oxygen during the Hangenberg event was probably also somewhere between 16% and 12%.

It is generally assumed that the amphibians developed in the Devonian period, around 370 million years ago. They came from earlier lobe-finned fish similar to the modern coelacanth and lungfish, which had evolved multi-jointed leg-like fins with digits that enabled them to crawl along the shallow bottom [810].

The important examples of the early amphibian evolution include:
  • ! Canada
    • " Eusthenopteron foordi lived during the Late Devonian period, about 385 million years ago. The fossils have been found in Miguasha, Quebec [11].

    • " Tiktaalik roseae is an extinct lobe-finned fish from the late Devonian period, 383-million-year-old, found on Ellesmere Island in Nunavut, Canada [9]

    • " Elpistostege watsoni is an extinct tetrapod-like fish, found at Escuminac Formation in Quebec, Canada [12].

  • ! East Greenland
    • " Ichthyostega stensioei lived at the end of the Upper Devonian period (374 – 359 million years ago), with developed lungs and limbs [13].

  • ! Europe
    • " Fossils of Panderichthys rhombolepis, an extinct fish with differentiated distal radial bones, were found in Baltic sediments of Latvia and Poland [14], estimated as 397 million years old.

  • ! Western Australia
    • " Fossils of Gogonasus andrewsae, an extinct 380 million-year-old lobe-finned fish with large spiracular openings, found in Western Australia [15].

Noting that all these fossils from nowadays geographically remote locations had similar climates in the late Devonian is important. Due to plate tectonics, some 380 Mya, Ellesmere Island, Quebec and Greenland were all parts of the continent Laurentia. Sometime between 416 and 359.2 Mya, Laurentia collided with Baltica, forming a minor supercontinent Euramerica [16]. So during the critical phase of tetrapod evolution, the eastern Canada, Greenland and Baltica were all near the equator and had a warm and humid climate with abundant bodies of shallow water. Western Australia was then within the Gondwana continent, in the south temperate latitudes, also with a warm and humid climate.

During the introduction of amphibians in the late Devonian [17], the atmospheric O2 levels were only 15% [6, 7]. Since O2 solubility is reduced in warm water (Additional file 1: Table S1 based on data from: http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/oxygen-solubility-water-d_841.html), shallow or stationary aquatic habitats can easily become oxygen depleted on a hot day, despite the oxygen abundance in the surrounding air:
  • ! Within this frame of survival pressures, gradual emergence of late Devonian lobe-finned fishes seems inevitable. To get some oxygen from air by using their vascularized gas bladders, their ancestors could not afford much energy expenditure to remain just beneath the water surface. Animals with strong fins could support them near the water surface without muscle activity.
    • " Breathing air through large spiracles while supported by strong fins was advantageous in oxygen depleted waters due to high daily temperatures.

    • " The next big step was development of primitive lungs, as found in the extant lung fish [18]. Primitive lungs allowed prolonged survival during drought.

Despite primitive lungs and strong, maneuverable fins, no real pressure for fish to leave water and move on land existed before the hypoxic Hangenberg event (some 358.9 ± 0.4 Mya) (Additional files 1 and 2: Tables S1 and S2).

All aquatic animals faced danger from hypoxia and many species vanished. However, the lobe-finned fish had no alterative, but to breathe air and use limbs to move over the land and find better habitats.

A related scenario possibly happened in the sea. Although for more than 100 Myr the global ocean remained warm, it contained sufficient oxygen to support diverse animal life only in the superficial layer [19]. Overall hypoxia has probably forced animals from deeper layers to ascend closer to the water surface.

The proposed interpretation is that terrestrial migration of early amphibians should be considered as an inevitable event caused by the hypoxic Hangenberg event.

The Carboniferous phase of animal evolution under oxygen abundance

Since the first terrestrial plants were quickly followed by early insects, it can be assumed that early insects ate either plants, or other insects. Indirect evidences that the Carboniferous world was terrorized by early insects can be found in thick bark, small leaves and high lignin content of these early plants. These features prevailed until the P-Tr extinction event that also marks the disappearance of giant insects. Soon after the P-Tr event, the low lignin conifer trees started to spread [20], suggesting that lignin armor was no more necessary to deal with the surviving small Triassic insects.

During the Carboniferous period (358.9–298.9 Mya), the average O2 atmospheric content was 32%, while CO2 was 800 ppm. It is assumed that the average temperature was similar to present values. During the following Permian period (298.9–252.2 Mya), the average O2 content has dropped to 23%, CO2 raised to 900 ppm and temperature was 2°C above the present level [6, 7, 2123].

Amphibians that started to roam the coasts of early Carboniferous rain forests were soon faced with a growing threat from many insects that gradually became giant, due to increasing atmospheric O2 content [23] (Additional file 3: Table S3, calculated by the pO2 calculator available at: http://www.altitude.org/air_pressure.php).

This danger left the amphibians few choices: some amphibians have also become giant and thus more able to defend from dangerous insects, the other amphibians were forced to migrate along rivers to higher terrains with fewer giant insects. The proposed slow ascend of small amphibians along rivers probably took millions of years, until they have reached the highest mountain slopes with enough water for their survival. The altitude was probably between 1000 and 2000 m above the sea level (Additional files 2 and 3: Tables S2 and S3).

Even during the hyperoxic periods, insects not much larger than the modern insects can live in high mountains [24], due both to low pO2 (Additional file 3: Table S3) and reduced humidity [25]. Small amphibians that migrated to high mountains became insectivores of these much smaller insects, instead of being the prey of giant insects at the sea level.

Diversification of amphibians in high altitude habitats

The amphibians wet skin used for respiration soon became an obstacle for living in more arid high altitude habitats. This was a strong survival pressure for developing impermeable skin and improved lungs leading to early reptiles, able to roam dry mountains and lay amniotic eggs with hard shells. These animals required strong muscles with high perfusion rates to move up the steep mountain slopes. To avoid pulmonary edema due to increased pressures in pulmonary vessels, they must have evolved some type of efficient separation of low pressure pulmonary and high pressure systemic circulation [25, 26]. This development will finally lead to 4-chambered found in avian and in mammalian hearts.

Early reptiles developed more efficient lungs probably of two separate types:
  • ! alveolar lungs developed in reptiles that will become the mammalian ancestors

  • ! lungs with respiratory ducts [27] developed in reptiles that will become archosaurs. Some of these animals remained near the high mountain waters, developing in crocodile ancestors [28].

Overpopulation of mountain water-reach oases made some animals to go deeper into the mountain, looking for food. Most of the archosaurs were heavy built terrestrial animals, thus destined to become dinosaurs in the Jurassic.

The rest of smaller species survived through fast climbing of steep and arid high mountain slopes. They developed light pneumatised bones and, with highly efficient cardiorespiratory system, became the ancestors of pterosaurs and birds. In this interpretation, limb precursors of wings might have been an important adaptation for balancing while moving on steep slopes, particularly during descending.

Stratification of the biosphere by altitude

It is here proposed that the Carboniferous terrestrial life was stratified in TWO ISOLATED WORLDS:
  • ! at the sea-level, giant insects and amphibians fought in Carboniferous rainforests, while the atmospheric O2 content was near 35% [6, 7].

  • ! highland areas formed an archipelago of mountainous zones free of giant animals. These areas were isolated by the low lands rainforests:
    • " Mountain oases with smaller plants, less water and no threat of giant insects made them probable cradles of animal and plant evolution. This has led to the emergence of rapid growing, thin bark conifers, like the earliest conifers of North America found in the upland [20].

Carboniferous combination of a rise in O2 level and drop in CO2, has probably resulted from large carbon sequestration when terrestrial plants were buried in swamps and other soft terrains. This lack of plant decomposition resulted in abundant coal deposits. This carbon sequestration is possibly responsible for the gradual global cooling and collapse of Carboniferous rain forests. In the late Carboniferous, climate has become colder, more arid and the relative oxygen content started to decline from the peak value [6, 7]. All these changes made animal life more difficult, particularly for the large insects and amphibians and for animals that lived in mountains.

Ural orogeny and Permian phase of animal evolution

Noting that during Permian and Triassic, the two important mountain ridges have slowly risen is important. The Australian Hunter-Bowen orogeny started in Permian was in that period far south from the equator. Ural mountains have risen to an estimated height of 3000 m [29] in the northern zone. This orogeny started from 318 Mya, in the late Carboniferous, and lasted to 251 Mya at the P-Tr event. Even today, this old mountain range peaks at 1895 m above the sea level. The earliest known fossils of Archosaurs have been found on the European Ural side, estimated 275 Myr old [30].

It is here presumed that the Ural orogeny slowly elevated several highland habitats within the modern Ural region to heights above 2500 m. Since this process took near 60 Myr, animals in these habitats had enough time fully to adapt to hypoxia (at 2500 m, the pO2 is below 80% of the sea level value, Additional file 3: Table S3).

During Ural orogeny, animals could descend to the less elevated mountain slopes that remained above the dangerous lowland habitat. Mammalian ancestors probably remained in many areas bellow 1500 m, with sufficient water and pO2 to support limited capacity of their lungs and kidneys, while the early archosaurs with respiratory ducts in their lungs could easily adapt to hypoxia in higher mountain areas (more than 2000 m above the sea level).

Lignin decomposition as a new biological corrective of climate changes

Perhaps the most striking new peace of evidence, potentially related to these changes in O2 and CO2 air levels, came from new insights in the lignin decomposition. Floudas et al. [31] analyzed 31 fungal genomes to find out when lignin decomposition had arisen. The results suggest that rot fungi evolved almost simultaneously with a sharp decrease in the rate of organic carbon burial at the end of the Carboniferous period, at around 290 Mya. The decomposition of accumulated and still air exposed lignin probably continued the whole late Permian, since the real “coal gap” happened during the Early Triassic [32] with almost no coal deposits.

Since all rotting uses oxygen and produces CO2, it seems plausible that fungal rotting has decomposed accumulated plant material that has not been deeply buried and this carbon was slowly released back into the air as CO2. The expected consequence is that lignin rotting has reduced the Permian O2 levels and increased the CO2 level, leading to the warmer Permian climate.

Animal migration to lower habitats during the hypoxic P-Tr extinction

The protracted P-Tr hypoxic extinction event with combination of increased temperature, ocean acidity, hypoxia and hypercapnia killed many aquatic and terrestrial animals due to the abruptly reduced oxygen availability. A possibly related feature is the presence of the "fungal spike" in rocks near the Permian–Triassic boundary [33, 34].

It seems probable that on lowlands only small sized insects survived and the disappearance of giant insects made the spreading of fast-growing conifers feasible. New forests were soon repopulated by mammaliaformes that came down from several highland areas (Lystrosaurs might be an example [35]). Archosaurs were probably late in repopulation of the low lands from high mountain areas. Since they were adapted to very low pO2, archosaurs were not forced to descend to the sea level before the Triassic nadir value of 12% of relative oxygen content has been reached. During that devastating period, archosaurs prevailed in lowlands as only animals that could cope with profound hypoxia.

Some archosaurs, previously adapted to swimming in mountain rivers, probbaly reduced their oxygen demand by entering the low land rivers and became ancestors of crocodiles. Other archosaurs adapted to rapid climbing with improved cardiorespiratory functions and pneumatised bones. They became the ancestors of birds and pterosaurs. The remaining heavy built archosaurs also descended to the lowlands and became dinosaurs in Jurassic. It seems vary plausible that when the world has cooled and O2 level recovered, the highlands were also repopulated, this time by small archosaurs looking for places without large predators.

Possible extrapolations

Additional file 2: Table S2 shows all mentioned points of animal evolution that were possibly related to the oxygen availability, suggesting that several great animal transitions and migrations might have been induced by reduced oxygen availability. After these disasters, the devastated biosphere was repeatedly repopulated from fringe habitats. On the other hand, periods of increased atmospheric oxygen often resulted in giant predators in lowland habitats, thus forcing smaller and weaker animals to live in relative safety of high mountains. All these topographic, altitude dependent biosphere fragmentations, defined by local oxygen and water availability, allowed separate evolution of small habitats for millions of years.

An obvious extrapolation of the presented interpretation regarding emergence of homeothermy as the prevalent metabolic mode of terrestrial and aerial animals is that the common ancestor of birds and non crocodilian archosaurs probably shared similar hearts, lungs and kidneys. If so, the full homeothermy is not expected to be present if these animals lived in warm habitats. Despite anatomic and physiological similarities of some dinosaurs with birds, it seems plausible that they did not need thermal insulation and stable endothermy. Instead of that, they required cooling mechanisms to dissipate heat after surges in energy expenditure.

Avian and mammalian sex chromosomes are important as determinations of inherited and thus temperature independent sex determination. After the K-Pg meteor impact, the birds and mammals with sex chromosomes reproduced well even in cold climates, while other animals with temperature dependent sex determination possibly failed, as has already been proposed [36, 37].

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This theoretic paper is a part of the research project 219-2192382-2426, financed by the Croatian Ministry of Science.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Osijek Medical Faculty, Department of Physiology

References

  1. Dietl GP: The escalation hypothesis: one long argument. Palaios. 2003, 18: 83-86. 10.1669/0883-1351(2003)18<83:TEHOLA>2.0.CO;2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Kemp TS: The origin of higher taxa: macroevolutionary processes, and the case of the mammals. Acta Zool. 2007, 88: 3-22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Kurbel S: Hypothesis of homeothermy evolution on isolated South China Craton that moved from equator to cold north latitudes 250-200Myr ago. J Theor Biol. 2014, 340: 232-237.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Sandberg CA, Morrow JR, Ziegler W: Late Devonian sea-level changes, catastrophic events, and mass extinctions. Geological Soc Am Spec Pap. 2002, 356: 473-487. doi:10.1130/0-8137-2356-6.473Google Scholar
  5. Engel MS, Grimaldi DA: New light shed on the oldest insect. Nature. 2002, 356: 473-487. doi:10.1130/0-8137-2356-6.473Google Scholar
  6. Erwin DH: Climate as a driver of evolutionary change. Curr Biol. 2009, 19: R575-R583. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.047.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Huey RB, Ward PD: Climbing a Triassic Mount Everest: into thinner air. JAMA. 2005, 294: 1761-1762.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Shubin NH, Daeschler EB, Jenkins FA: The pectoral fin of Tiktaalik roseae and the origin of the tetrapod limb. Nature. 2006, 440: 764-771. 10.1038/nature04637.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Daeschler EB, Shubin NH, Jenkins FA: A Devonian tetrapod-like fish and the evolution of the tetrapod body plan. Nature. 2006, 440: 757-763. 10.1038/nature04639.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ahlberg PE, Clack JA: Palaeontology: a firm step from water to land. Nature. 2006, 440: 747-749. 10.1038/440747a.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Schultze HP: Juvenile specimens of Eusthenopteron foordi Whiteaves, 1881 (osteolepiform rhipidistian, pisces) from the Late Devonian of Miguasha, Quebec, Canada. J Vertebr Paleontol. 1984, 4: 1-16. 10.1080/02724634.1984.10011982.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Schultze HP, Arsenault M: The panderichthyid fish Elpistostege: a close relative of tetrapods?. Paleontology. 1985, 28: 293-309.Google Scholar
  13. Ahlberg PE, Clack JA, Blom H: The axial skeleton of the Devonian tetrapod Ichthyostega. Nature. 2005, 437: 137-140. 10.1038/nature03893.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Boisvert CA: The pelvic fin and girdle of Panderichthys and the origin of tetrapod locomotion. Nature. 2005, 438: 1145-1147. 10.1038/nature04119.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Long JA, Young GC, Holland T, Senden TJ, Fitzgerald EM: An exceptional Devonian fish from Australia sheds light on tetrapod origins. Nature. 2006, 444: 199-202. 10.1038/nature05243.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sahney S, Benton MJ, Falcon-Lang HJ: Rainforest collapse triggered Carboniferous tetrapod diversification in Euramerica. Geology. 2010, 38: 1079-1082. 10.1130/G31182.1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Clack JA: Devonian climate change, breathing, and the origin of the tetrapod stem group. Integr Comp Biol. 2007, 47: 510-523. 10.1093/icb/icm055.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Farmer C: Did lungs and the intracardiac shunt evolve to oxygenate the heart in vertebrates?. Paleobiology. 1997, 23: 358-372.Google Scholar
  19. Holland HD: The oxygenation of the atmosphere and oceans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006, 361: 903-915. 10.1098/rstb.2006.1838.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lyons PC, Darrah WC: Earliest conifers in North America; upland and/or paleoclimatic indicators?. Palaios. 1989, 4: 480-486. 10.2307/3514592. published online October 1, 1989, doi:10.2307/3514592View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Berner RA, Petsch ST, Lake JA, Beerling DJ, Popp BN, Lane RS, Quick WP: Isotope fractionation and atmospheric oxygen: implications for Phanerozoic O2 evolution. Science. 2000, 287: 1630-1633. 10.1126/science.287.5458.1630.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Berner RA, VandenBrooks JM, Ward PD: Oxygen and evolution. Science. 2007, 316: 557-558. 10.1126/science.1140273.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Dudley R: Atmospheric oxygen, giant Paleozoic insects and the evolution of aerial locomotor performance. J Exp Biol. 1998, 201: 1043-1050.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Dillon ME, Frazier MR, Dudley R: Into thin air: physiology and evolution of alpine insects. Integr Comp Biol. 2006, 46: 49-61. 10.1093/icb/icj007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hicks JW: The physiological and evolutionary significance of cardiovascular shunting patterns in reptiles. Physiology. 2002, 17: 241-245.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Snyder GK, Sheafor BA: Red blood cells: centerpiece in the evolution of the vertebrate circulatory system. Am Zool. 1999, 39: 189-198.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Farmer CG, Sanders K: Unidirectional airflow in the lungs of alligators. Science. 2010, 327: 338-340. 10.1126/science.1180219.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Schachner ER, Hutchinson JR, Farmer CG: Pulmonary anatomy in the Nile crocodile and the evolution of unidirectional airflow in Archosauria. Peer J. 2013, 1: e60-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Péron S, Bourquin S, Fluteau F, Guillocheau F: Paleoenvironment reconstructions and climate simulations of the Early Triassic: impact of the water and sediment supply on the preservation of fluvial systems. Geodin Acta. 2005, 18: 431-446. 10.3166/ga.18.431-446.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. The Age of Dinosaurs in Russia and Mongolia. Edited by: Benton MJ, Shishkin MA, Unwin DM, Kurochkin EN. 2003, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  31. Floudas D, Binder M, Riley R, Barry K, Blanchette RA, Henrissat B, Patyshakuliyeva A: The Paleozoic origin of enzymatic lignin decomposition reconstructed from 31 fungal genomes. Science. 2012, 336: 1715-1719. 10.1126/science.1221748.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Retallack GJ, Veevers JJ, Morante R: Global coal gap between Permian–Triassic extinction and Middle Triassic recovery of peat-forming plants. Geol Soc Am Bull. 1996, 108: 195-207. 10.1130/0016-7606(1996)108<0195:GCGBPT>2.3.CO;2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Eshet Y, Rampino MR, Visscher H: Fungal event and palynological record of ecological crisis and recovery across the Permian-Triassic boundary. Geology. 1995, 23: 967-970. 10.1130/0091-7613(1995)023<0967:FEAPRO>2.3.CO;2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Steiner MB, Eshet Y, Rampino MR, Schwindt DM: Fungal abundance spike and the Permian–Triassic boundary in the Karoo Supergroup (South Africa). Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 2003, 194: 405-414. 10.1016/S0031-0182(03)00230-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Lucas SG: Timing and magnitude of tetrapod extinctions across the Permo-Triassic boundary. J Asian Earth Sci. 2009, 36: 491-502. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2008.11.016.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Paladino FV, Dodson P, Hammond JK, Spotila JR: Temperature-dependent sex determination in dinosaurs? Implications for population dynamics and extinction. Geol Soc Am Spec Pap. 1989, 238: 63-70.Google Scholar
  37. Miller D, Summers J, Silber S: Environmental versus genetic sex determination: a possible factor in dinosaur extinction?. Fertil Steril. 2004, 81: 954-964. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.09.051.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Kurbel; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.