Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 4 Linear regression results.

From: Analysing Twitter and web queries for flu trend prediction

  "cold" negative "cold" positive
flu reg exp 0.837
expanded reg exp 0.801
Queries 0.571
Queries + flu reg exp 0.849
Queries + expanded reg exp 0.885
Naïve Bayes Counts Probabilities 0.761 0.804 0.825 0.824
Naïve Bayes + Queries Counts Probabilities 0.781 0.794 0.872 0.886
Naïve Bayes + expanded reg exp Counts Probabilities 0.770 0.807 0.703 0.791
Naïve Bayes + expanded reg exp + Queries Counts Probabilities 0.873 0.867 0.836 0.801
  1. Pearson's correlation ratios between linear regression estimates and Influenzanet data. flu and expanded regular expressions correspond to the pattern for "gripe" (flu) word derivations and the complete pattern as shown in Table 1, respectively. The weekly relative frequency was calculated based on the number of positively classified tweets (counts) or on the probabilities given by the classifier (Eq. 2). Tweets referring to "cold " were used either as positive or negative data when training the classifier.