Regular mosaic pattern development: A study of the interplay between lateral inhibition, apoptosis and differential adhesion

Table 1 Comparison of models

	CD E9	CD E12	Model 0	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3	Model 4
\|ρ_p∈ n (σ_s)\|	2.48 ± 0.07	3.07 ± 0.09	2.12 ± 0.69	2.16 ± 0.71	2.25 ± 0.66	2.46 ± 0.50	2.52 ± 0.50
\|ρ_s∈ n (σ_p)\|	4.56 ± 0.11	5.23 ± 0.16	5.81 ± 0.56	5.69 ± 0.51	5.65 ± 0.55	5.76 ± 0.56	5.68 ± 0.60
VRI	2.31	3.44	3.02 ± 0.24	3.08 ± 0.20	3.60 ± 0.54	4.50 ± 0.63	4.34 ± 0.61
$\frac{\| σ_{s} \|}{\| σ_{p} \|}$	1.85 ± 0.05	1.71 ± 0.05	2.83 ± 0.10	2.81 ± 0.11	3.00 ± 0.05	2.23 ± 0.07	2.23 ± 0.075
Defect Rate	9.00 ± 1.00	0.00 ± 0.00	8.69 ± 3.09	9.55 ± 0.64	5.81 ± 2.99	0.00 ± 0.00	0.00 ± 0.00

Comparison of the central distal (CD) chick basilar papilla cell mosaic development studied in [18] with model results. |ρ_p∈ n(σ_s)| is the average count of primary cells around each secondary cell, |ρ_s∈ n(σ_p)| is the average count of secondary cells around each primary, and $\frac{| σ_{s} |}{| σ_{p} |}$ is the ratio of the number of secondary cells by the number of primary cells. Error bands are one standard deviation, based on 40 random repeats of each model.

ISSN: 1742-4682