Skip to main content

Table 1 MLE for the first simulation, in which all reviewers had good acumen

From: Maximum likelihood estimation of reviewers' acumen in central review setting: categorical data

 

R1

R2

R3

R4

R5

R6

0.8

0.8

0.8

0.8

0.8

0.8

0.8

0.8

0.7

0.8

0.8

0.8

0.8

0.8

0.8

0.8

0.8

0.7

0.8

0.8

0.8

0.8

0.8

0.8

0.78 (0.09)

0.78 (0.09)

0.78 (0.1)

0.78 (0.09)

0.78 (0.09)

0.78 (0.1)

0.78 (0.09)

0.78 (0.09)

0.69 (0.11)

0.78 (0.09)

0.78 (0.09)

0.78 (0.1)

0.8 (0.08)

0.79 (0.07)

0.8 (0.09)

0.8 (0.08)

0.8 (0.07)

0.7 (0.1)

0.8 (0.08)

0.8 (0.08)

0.8 (0.09)

0.8 (0.08)

0.8 (0.08)

0.81 (0.09)