From: Maximum likelihood estimation of reviewers' acumen in central review setting: categorical data
 |  | Category |  |  |  |  | Category |  |  |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Patient | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 0.14 | 0.86 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 0 | 0 | 0.95 | 0.05 | 25 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4 | 0.24 | 0.76 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 0 | 0.93 | 0.07 | 0 |
5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7 | 0.68 | 0.32 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0.82 | 0.18 | 0 | 0 |
8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 31 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
10 | 0 | 0.85 | 0.15 | 0 | 33 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 34 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
12 | 0 | 0.65 | 0.35 | 0 | 35 | 0 | 0.93 | 0.07 | 0 |
13 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0.73 | 0.27 |
14 | 0.11 | 0.89 | 0 | 0 | 37 | 0.14 | 0.85 | 0.02 | 0 |
15 | 0.99 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 0 | 0.51 | 0.49 | 0 |
16 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
17 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
18 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
19 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 42 | 0.89 | 0.11 | 0 | 0 |
20 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 0 | 0 | 43 | 0 | 0.93 | 0.07 | 0 |
21 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 0.99 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 |
22 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
23 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |