Table 5 Comparison of the growth rates obtained with respect to those calculated using the percentage changes by Stokes et al.[5]
From: Computational modeling of the mechanical modulation of the growth plate by sustained loading
Δσ n [MPa] | G[μm/day] | G Stokes [μm/day] | Error [%] |
|---|---|---|---|
0.1 | 235.1 | 228.7 | 2.77 |
0.0 | 223.2 | 217.0 | 2.86 |
−0.1 | 189.6 | 183.4 | 3.42 |
−0.2 | 169.9 | 163.8 | 3.73 |