Skip to main content

Table 4 Model comparison

From: Estimating transmission probability in schools for the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic in Italy

Model

School A

School B

CGS (q c ,q g ,q s ,ε)

702.83

757.91

S (q c =q g =q s ,ε)

799.91

779.38

CS (q c ,q g =q s ,ε)

774.91

761.16

CGSvar (q c ,q g ,q s ,ε var )

751.20

426.21

  1. DIC values of the different models considered. Model CGS has three different transmission rates inside the school (q c , q g and q s ). Model S has a homogeneous infection rate inside the school (q c ). Model CS has a transmission rate for the class (q c ) and a different transmission rate in the remaining part of the school (q g ). Model CGSvar is the same as CGS but with a non-constant ε
Back to article page

Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling

ISSN: 1742-4682