Skip to main content

Table 2 Reproducibility results for w m (α, β, t). Entries include, Lin’s concordance correlation coefficients \( \left(\hat{\rho}\right) \), root mean square deviations (rms) and ratios of 〈w m (α, β, t)〉 to 〈w m (t)〉 averages

From: On the suitability of an allometric proxy for nondestructive estimation of average leaf dry weight in eelgrass shoots I: sensitivity analysis and examination of the influences of data quality, analysis method, and sample size on precision

Analysis method Data

w m (α, β, t)〉/〈w m (t) 〉

\( \widehat{\rho} \)

rms

Log-linear Transformation Raw

0.8436

0.9285

0.01265

Nonlinear Regression Raw

0.9773

0.9915

0.00460

Log-linear Transformation Processed

0.8588

0.9489

0.01264

Nonlinear Regression Processed

0.9975

0.9976

0.00293