Skip to main content

Table 3 ERS vs. CRS model, simulated by MiStImm 500–500 times as the mean waiting time between two divisions of a pathogen is increasing (from 40 to 80) and the initial number of pathogens is fixed (350)

From: MiStImm: an agent-based simulation tool to study the self-nonself discrimination of the adaptive immune response

div time

f cells

ERS wins

CRS wins

ratio

p-value

40

350

208

66

3.152

1.19E-24

50

350

417

225

1.853

4.48E-38

60

350

473

320

1.478

1.16E-35

70

350

493

400

1.233

1.42E-24

80

350

500

441

1.134

2.81E-19

  1. The table shows how the performance of ERS and CRS model is changing when we increase the mean waiting time between two divisions of a pathogen. Column labels are the same as in Table 2 but the positions of the columns “f cells” and “div time” are switched. In every cases ERS performed significantly better than CRS