Skip to main content

Table 4 The effect of the size of the perturbation

From: Priming nonlinear searches for pathway identification

 

Computed

5 %

10 %

50 %

200 %

a10

0

0.0000

0.0000

0.0001

0.0008

a11

-14.6780

-14.3647

-14.1817

-13.1496

-11.3439

a12

0

-0.1466

-0.1429

-0.0671

0.5735

a13

7.3390

7.3414

7.3438

7.3598

7.3735

a14

0

-0.2165

-0.3673

-1.2462

-2.7619

a15

-7.3390

-7.1723

-7.0780

-6.4846

-5.2501

a20

0

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

-0.0003

a21

14.6780

14.6119

14.5748

14.4207

14.5029

a22

-14.6780

-14.6540

-14.6623

-14.7503

-15.1862

a23

0

-0.0009

-0.0016

-0.0054

-0.0070

a24

0

0.0494

0.0839

0.2494

0.3462

a25

0

-0.0309

-0.0464

-0.1119

-0.0951

a30

0

0.0000

0.0000

0.0004

0.0038

a31

0

-2.3527

-4.5412

-18.2307

-46.8953

a32

0

1.3989

2.6336

9.8422

24.4004

a33

-27.2517

-27.9204

-28.5955

-34.0204

-54.4047

a34

0

1.7491

3.4009

14.0961

39.3252

a35

0

-0.9955

-1.8949

-7.0627

-15.4759

a40

0

0.0000

0.0000

-0.0001

0.0001

a41

0

2.0843

3.7814

14.7316

41.5863

a42

0

-1.0925

-1.7693

-5.5766

-13.2688

a43

18.5664

19.0295

19.4964

23.2397

37.1866

a44

-18.5664

-20.2112

-21.6608

-31.4631

-58.1065

a45

-9.2832

-8.3594

-7.6404

-3.2226

6.5808

a50

0

0.0000

0.0000

-0.0001

-0.0015

a51

0

-0.4026

-0.6581

-2.5848

-10.1097

a52

0

0.1384

0.0830

-0.1317

0.1582

a53

0

-0.0059

-0.0110

-0.0435

-0.0879

a54

18.5664

18.8987

19.1602

21.0620

27.2722

a55

-18.5664

-18.7852

-18.9201

-20.0013

-24.0836

  1. Overall, the estimated coefficients deviate more strongly from the corresponding computed values as the perturbation increases. However, there are substantial differences between variables. The coefficients associated with variable X2, for example, are hardly influenced, while the coefficients associated with X3 are strongly affected. Overall, the method seems to produce the best results for perturbation up to 10%. The datasets for the regression consisted of 401 data points in the interval [0,4] and the method of linearization was option II.