div time | f cells | ERS wins | CRS wins | ratio | p-value |
---|
40 | 350 | 208 | 66 | 3.152 | 1.19E-24 |
50 | 350 | 417 | 225 | 1.853 | 4.48E-38 |
60 | 350 | 473 | 320 | 1.478 | 1.16E-35 |
70 | 350 | 493 | 400 | 1.233 | 1.42E-24 |
80 | 350 | 500 | 441 | 1.134 | 2.81E-19 |
- The table shows how the performance of ERS and CRS model is changing when we increase the mean waiting time between two divisions of a pathogen. Column labels are the same as in Table 2 but the positions of the columns “f cells” and “div time” are switched. In every cases ERS performed significantly better than CRS