Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Fig. 7 | Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling

Fig. 7

From: On the suitability of an allometric proxy for nondestructive estimation of average leaf dry weight in eelgrass shoots I: sensitivity analysis and examination of the influences of data quality, analysis method, and sample size on precision

Fig. 7

The effects of sample size on reproducibility of w(α,β,t). For raw data a sample of size k = 0.20n ra (or near 2000 leaves) yields reasonable reproducibility (\( \widehat{\uprho} \)(k) = 0.9889). But, for quality controlled data similar reproducibility associates to only k = 0.10n rq (about 1000 leaves). Larger sample would not induce a significant changes in the values of \( \widehat{\uprho} \)(k)

Back to article page