# The velocity of the arterial pulse wave: a viscous-fluid shock wave in an elastic tube

- Page R Painter
^{1}Email author

**5**:15

https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4682-5-15

© Painter; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

**Received: **11 April 2008

**Accepted: **29 July 2008

**Published: **29 July 2008

## Abstract

### Background

The arterial pulse is a viscous-fluid shock wave that is initiated by blood ejected from the heart. This wave travels away from the heart at a speed termed the pulse wave velocity (PWV). The PWV increases during the course of a number of diseases, and this increase is often attributed to arterial stiffness. As the pulse wave approaches a point in an artery, the pressure rises as does the pressure gradient. This pressure gradient increases the rate of blood flow ahead of the wave. The rate of blood flow ahead of the wave decreases with distance because the pressure gradient also decreases with distance ahead of the wave. Consequently, the amount of blood per unit length in a segment of an artery increases ahead of the wave, and this increase stretches the wall of the artery. As a result, the tension in the wall increases, and this results in an increase in the pressure of blood in the artery.

### Methods

An expression for the PWV is derived from an equation describing the flow-pressure coupling (FPC) for a pulse wave in an incompressible, viscous fluid in an elastic tube. The initial increase in force of the fluid in the tube is described by an increasing exponential function of time. The relationship between force gradient and fluid flow is approximated by an expression known to hold for a rigid tube.

### Results

For large arteries, the PWV derived by this method agrees with the Korteweg-Moens equation for the PWV in a non-viscous fluid. For small arteries, the PWV is approximately proportional to the Korteweg-Moens velocity divided by the radius of the artery. The PWV in small arteries is also predicted to increase when the specific rate of increase in pressure as a function of time decreases. This rate decreases with increasing myocardial ischemia, suggesting an explanation for the observation that an increase in the PWV is a predictor of future myocardial infarction. The derivation of the equation for the PWV that has been used for more than fifty years is analyzed and shown to yield predictions that do not appear to be correct.

### Conclusion

Contrary to the theory used for more than fifty years to predict the PWV, it speeds up as arteries become smaller and smaller. Furthermore, an increase in the PWV in some cases may be due to decreasing force of myocardial contraction rather than arterial stiffness.

## Keywords

## Introduction

Following the opening of the aortic valve in early systole, blood pressure in the aorta rises rapidly as does the velocity of blood flow. This increase in blood pressure and momentum travels the length of the aorta and is also passed on to blood in arteries that branch from the aorta (e.g. carotid, brachial and mesenteric arteries). The phenomenon of rapidly increasing pressure and velocity spreading from the aortic root to distal arteries is termed the pulse wave.

*d*, the assumptions that sea water is incompressible and that viscous forces are negligible lead to the predicted speed

*(gd)*

^{ 1/2 }, where

*g*is the acceleration due to gravity [1]. For a shock wave moving through an incompressible, non-viscous fluid of density

*ρ*in a cylindrical elastic tube of wall thickness

*h*and elastic modulus

*E*, the speed, denoted

*c*

_{0}, predicted by Korteweg [2] and Moens [3] is

The product *Eh* is the ratio of tension in the tube's wall to the fractional amount of circumferential stretching, and *R* is the radius of the tube measured from the central axis to the inner face of the wall.

The speed of the arterial pulse wave is commonly termed the pulse-wave velocity (PWV). It has been shown to increase during the course of certain diseases, and this increase has generally been attributed to "arterial stiffness" [4–7]. This interpretation is consistent with Equation (1), the Korteweg-Moens Equation, which is based in part on the assumption that the fluid is not viscous.

Lambossy [8] introduced a model for arterial blood flow in which viscosity results in shear force on the inner wall of an artery and the pressure gradient is a simple harmonic function of time, $\stackrel{\u2323}{A}$*e*^{
iωt
}. In this model, $\stackrel{\u2323}{A}$ is a constant, and *ω* is the frequency of oscillation. Other constants in the model are he viscosity of blood, denoted *μ*, and the density, denoted *ρ*. The arterial wall is a straight, rigid cylindrical tube of radius *R*.

*α*=

*R*(

*ωρ*/

*μ*)

^{1/2}, and

*J*

_{ m }(

*i*

^{3/2}

*α*) is the Bessel function of order

*m*and variable

*i*

^{3/2}

*α:*

When *α*^{2} ≫ 8, -*J*_{2}(*i*^{3/2}*α*)/*J*_{0}(*i*^{3/2}*α*) ≈ 1, and *c*/*c*_{0} is approximately 1. When *α*^{2} ≪ 8, -*J*_{2}(*i*^{3/2}*α*)/*J*_{0}(*i*^{3/2}*α*) ≈ *iα*^{2}/8, and *c*/*c*_{0} is approximately proportional to *R*. For many years, the result of Womersley has been accepted as a good approximation for the PWV in relatively small arteries where -*J*_{2}(*i*^{3/2}*α*)/*J*_{0}(*i*^{3/2}*α*) differs significantly from 1 [10–12].

Some features of arterial blood flow are not well described by the Lambossy-Womersley model. For example, the relative rate of increase in the pressure gradient that results from the power of myocardial contraction is not described accurately by the simple harmonic pressure gradient assumed in the model. Furthermore, Womersley did not incorporate damping of the pressure wave in his model before solving for wave velocity. Womersley also introduced a number of approximations before arriving at the expression for the PWV. Therefore, we investigate the PWV in a model that (1) contains a parameter that describes the relative rate of rise of the pressure gradient, (2) includes an expression for damping of the pressure wave and (3) requires fewer assumptions and approximations in the derivation of an expression for the PWV.

### A model for the leading part of the pulse wave

*r*from the central axis of the artery is

*I*(

*i*

^{3/2}

*α*) = [-

*J*

_{2}(

*i*

^{3/2}

*α*)/

*J*

_{0}(

*i*

^{3/2}

*α*)]/(

*iωρ*) and write

*P*

_{ Q }(

*i*

^{3/2}

*α*) as

*J*

_{2}(

*i*

^{3/2}

*α*)/[(

*i*

^{3/2}

*α*)

^{2}/8] and note that as

*R*goes to zero the imaginary part of

*P*

_{ Q }(

*i*

^{3/2}

*α*) vanishes and |

*P*

_{ Q }(

*i*

^{3/2}

*α*)| goes to 1. Substitution now gives

Therefore, *I*(*i*^{3/2}*α*) is approximately *R*^{2}/(8*μ*) when *α*^{2} ≪ 8 and is approximately 1/(*iωρ*) when *α*^{2} ≫ 8.

The shear force (per unit area) at the inner wall of the tube is

*μ*[∂

*u*/∂

*r*|

_{r = R}= -[$\stackrel{\u2323}{A}$

*μ*/(

*ρiω*)]

*e*

^{ iωt }

*i*

^{3/2}(

*α*/

*R*)

*J*

_{-1}(

*i*

^{3/2}

*α*)/

*J*

_{0}

*(i*

^{3/2}

*α*), where

*i*

^{3/2}(

*α*/

*R*)

*J*

_{-1}(

*i*

^{3/2}

*α*) =

*dJ*

_{0}(

*i*

^{3/2}[

*ωρ*/

*μ*]

^{1/2}

*r*)/

*dr*|

_{r = R}. We note that -

*J*

_{-1}(

*i*

^{3/2}

*α*) =

*J*

_{1}(

*i*

^{3/2}

*α*), which is written as (

*i*

^{3/2}

*α*/2)

*P*

_{ S }(

*i*

^{3/2}

*α*). Substitution now gives the expression for the shear force (per unit area), [$\stackrel{\u2323}{A}$

*e*

^{ iωt }

*R*/2]

*P*

_{ S }(

*i*

^{3/2}

*α*)/

*J*

_{0}(

*i*

^{3/2}

*α*). This expression is further simplified to

The ratio of shear force per unit length, -2*πRμ*[∂*u*/∂*r*|_{r = R}, to volume flow rate is denoted *K*.

*Ae*

^{ at }. A solution for this exponential pressure-gradient model is generated by substituting

*A*for $\stackrel{\u2323}{A}$ and

*a*for

*iω*in Equations (4), (5) and (6). Note that, with these substitutions, the Bessel functions become real-valued series in which each term is a positive real number. The solutions for flow rate and shear force per unit area in the exponential pressure wave model are, respectively,

*β*=(

*aρ*/

*μ*)

^{1/2}. The function

*I*(

*iβR*) is equal to

*Q*divided by the force gradient

*πR*

^{2}

*Ae*

^{ at }. When

*P*_{
Q
}(*iβR*), *P*_{
S
}(*iβR*) and *J*_{0}(*iβR*) are approximately equal to 1, *I*(*iβR*) is approximately *R*^{2}/(8*μ*), and the function *K* is approximately equal to 8*μ*/(*ρR*^{2}). When *aρR*^{2}/*μ* ≫ 8, *I*(*iβR*) is approximately equal to 1/(*aρ*), and *K* is approximately equal to 0.

*F*=

*πR*

^{2}

*P*, is

where *a*, *b* and *f* are positive real-valued constants. At time *t*, this expression defines the force function of distance z along the tube. A point defined by a particular value of *z* can be traced backward in time to a point at *z* = 0 on the force function at time *t-z/c*. In the absence of damping as a result of shear forces, the value of the force function would be identical for these two points. Therefore, *fe*^{
at
}*e*^{-bz}= *fe*^{a(t-z/c)}, so that *b* = *z/c* in the absence of damping.

It is assumed that the ratio of flow rate to force gradient is constant in our model of a segment of an artery that does not contain a branch. An equivalent assumption is that the value of *R*^{2} does not vary significantly with decreasing pressure along the segment. As a consequence, it follows that flow rat, *Q*, is proportional to *e*^{a(t-z/c)}in the absence of damping, *i.e*. the flow wave is described by *Q*_{0}*e*^{a(t-z/c)}, where *Q*_{0} is the flow rate at *t* = 0 and *z* = 0.

*K*as it travels distance

*z = t/c*in time

*t*. Therefore, momentum, velocity and flow rate are reduced by the factor

*e*

^{-Kz/c}as the flow wave moves a distance equal to

*z*, and volume flow rate is proportional to

*Q*

_{0}

*e*

^{a(t-z/c)}

*e*

^{-Kz/c}. By analogy to the rigid-tube model where flow rate is proportional to the force gradient -∂

*F*/∂

*z*for small

*R*, it is assumed that, in the model where small changes in

*R*are allowed, force gradient is also proportional to volume flow rate (for small

*R*). Therefore force is likewise proportional to

*e*

^{a(t-z/c)}

*e*

^{-Kz/c}, and we write

*h*and elastic modulus equal to

*E*,

*F*=

*πEh*(

*R*-

*R*

_{0}), and ∂

*F*/∂

*z*=

*πEh*(∂

*R*/∂

*z*), which is rewritten as

*aρR*

^{2}/

*μ*<< 8.

*I*(

*iβR*) is approximated as

*R*

^{2}(8

*μ*), and the function

*K*is approximated as 8

*μ*/(

*ρR*

^{2}). Combining Equation (16) and (17) with Equation (14) leads to

*a*/

*K*=

*aρR*

^{2}/(8

*μ*) is assumed to be much smaller than 1,

This result is not in agreement with Womersley's prediction that the PWV is approximately proportional to *c*_{0} multiplied by *R* when *aρR*^{2}/*μ* << 8.

*aρR*

^{2}/

*μ*≫ 8,

*I*(

*iβR*) is approximately equal to 1/(

*aρ*), and

*K*is approximately equal to 0. Substitution into Equation (14) leads to the Korteweg-Moens expression,

where *h*_{
s
}and *ρ*_{
s
}are the thickness and density, respectively, of the wall and surrounding tissue accelerated by the increasing arterial pressure.

There are many published estimates of the modulus E for mammalian elastic arteries. Estimates from studies of the change in arterial radius with changes in pressure are usually between 10^{6} dynes/cm^{2} and 10^{7} dynes/cm^{2} [14, 15]. Therefore, the term *a*^{2}*R*^{2}*h*_{
s
}*ρ*_{
s
}may be small compared with Eh unless the rate of rise in the arterial pulse is very steep.

### Comparison with Womersley's derivation of the PWV

*ξ*and the longitudinal displacement by

*ς*. It is assumed that

*ξ*and

*ς*are described by harmonic functions:

*p*is also assumed to be a harmonic function

If *c* is a positive real number, this equation imposes a direction of flow for the pulse wave.

*ρ*

_{0}is the density of the fluid,

*C*

_{1}is a constant and

*F*

_{10}(

*α*) is 2

*J*

_{1}(

*i*

^{3/2}

*α*)/[

*i*

^{3/2}

*αJ*

_{0}(

*i*

^{3/2}

*α*)]. In Equations (37) and (38) of the article, the boundary conditions for the wall of the tube in contact with the fluid are described by:

where *ρ* is the density of the tube, *σ* is Poisson's ratio and *B* is *E*/(1-*σ*^{2}).

*A*

_{1},

*C*

_{1},

*D*

_{1}and

*E*

_{1}. Setting the determinant of coefficients equal to 0 gives the equation for

*c*. A solution for c is easily found when

*σ*= 0 and when the tube is tethered to surrounding structures so that

*E*

_{1}= 0. Combining Equations (27) and (28) gives

*J*

_{2}(

*i*

^{3/2}

*α*)/

*J*

_{0}(

*i*

^{3/2}

*α*) for 1-

*F*

_{10}(

*α*) gives

*ω*

^{2}

*Rhρ*/(2

*ρ*

_{0}) is small compared to

*Eh*/(2

*ρ*

_{0}

*R*), we have

Womersley interprets the imaginary part of 1/*c* multiplied by *ω* as the coefficient in the exponential damping function of the wave as a function of distance. The exponential damping coefficient of time is therefore equal to the real part of *c* times the imaginary part of 1/*c* multiplied by *ω*. When *α*^{2} << 8, the real part of *c* is approximately *c*_{0}*α*/4, and the imaginary part of 1/*c* is approximately 4/(*c*_{0}*α*). Therefore, the technique of Womersley leads to the prediction that the coefficient for the damping with time is approximately equal to *ω* and that this coefficient is approximately independent of the radius in small arteries. This does not make sense because Equations (5) and (6) show that for *α*^{2} << 8 the damping coefficient is approximately 8*μ*/(*ρR*^{2}), the expression used in the exponential pressure gradient model to describe damping of pulse waves in small arteries.

*σ*= 0 and

*E*

_{1}= 0 leads to

which can not be correct because it predicts that *c* does not approach the Korteweg-Moens velocity for large values of *R*.

*ω*

^{2}

*ρ*≪

*E*/

*R*

^{2}, the above equations are combined and approximated by

When *α*^{2} << 8, {1-*F*_{10}(*α*)}/(*iω*) is closely approximated by 1/*K*. Furthermore, replacing {1-*F*_{10}(*α*)}/(*iω*) by 1/*K* and replacing *iω* by the constant *a* gives Equation (21). Therefore, it appears that the difference between Equation (21) and the corresponding expression derived by Womersely for *c*^{2} in the tethered, thin-walled tube model is due largely to his omission of the expression for damping due to friction between the wall of the tube and blood moving downstream in the pressure wave.

## Discussion

One possible source of errors in the analysis of this paper is the limited consideration of changes in arterial radius. Such changes are fully considered only when the Law of Laplace, Equation (15), is incorporated in an expression. For this reason, caution should be exercised when using the above results to interpret data from arteries in which there is a considerable change in the radius and the cross-sectional area during the cardiac cycle. In large elastic arteries, this change in radius may be 10% or more from the median value [14], and this may be a source of error that is of concern in certain contexts.

In small arteries where pressure oscillations are of low magnitude, the above concern diminishes. In addition, as arteries become smaller and smaller, the flow becomes closely described by the equations for the rigid tube. Consequently, the damping function approaches the damping function calculated from Poiseuille's Equation. Therefore, concern for errors in the analysis is less for the expression giving the PWV in small arteries than it is for the expression giving the PWV in large arteries.

A plausible explanation for an increase in the PWV during the course of a disease is an increase in arterial stiffness leading to an increase in the parameter *E*. This explanation is largely based on the Korteweg-Moens equation. An increase in the elastic modulus, *E*, or the relative thickness of the arterial wall, *h/R*, would increase the PWV. However, changes in other properties associated with arterial walls and surrounding tissue may also increase the PWV and may be interpreted as increasing stiffness. One source of arterial stiffness that is not considered in the above analysis is production of heat as the arterial wall is stretched [14].

The above results show that the PWV can increase in small arteries if the parameter *a* decreases. The parameter *a* describes the rate of increase in pressure during the initial rise as the pulse wave approaches a point in an artery. This rise is determined by the rise in the ejection rate through the aortic valve in early systole. A number of heart disorders can affect this rate of rise. Examples include aortic stenosis, myocardial ischemia and certain conduction disorders. It appears plausible that, in certain diseases of the heart, attributing an increase in the PWV to arterial stiffness may not be the correct explanation. The link between an increase in the PWV and increased risk of myocardial infarction [7] may be due, at least in part, to myocardial ischemia.

## Declarations

### Acknowledgements

The author thanks Ann Young for many thoughtful discussions and thanks Paul Agutter for helpful suggestions and editorial comments.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Stein S, Okal EA: Seismology: speed and size of the Sumatra earthquake. Nature. 2005, 434: 573-574. 10.1038/434581a.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Korteweg DJ: Ueber die Fortpflanzungsgeschwindigkeit des Schalles in elastischen Röhren. Annalen der Physik. 1878, 24: 525-542.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moens AI: Die Pulskurve. 1878, Leiden: E. J. BrillGoogle Scholar
- Safar H, Chahwakilian A, Boudali Y, Debray-Meignan S, Safar M, Blacher J: Arterial stiffness, isolated systolic hypertension, and cardiovascular risk in the elderly. Am J Geriatr Cardiol. 2006, 15: 178-182. 10.1111/j.1076-7460.2006.04794.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mayer O, Filipovsky J, Dolejsova M, Cifkova R, Simon J, Bolek L: Mild hyperhomocysteinaemia is associated with increased aortic stiffness in general population. J Hum Hypertens. 2006, 20: 267-71. 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001983.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kullo IJ, Bielak LF, Turner ST, Sheedy PF, Peyser PA: Aortic pulse wave velocity is associated with the presence and quantity of coronary artery calcium: a community-based study. Hypertension. 2006, 47: 174-179. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000199605.35173.14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matsuoka O, Otsuka K, Murakami S, Hotta N, Yamanaka G, Kubo Y, Yamanaka T, Shinagawa M, Nunoda S, Nishimura Y, Shibata K, Saitoh H, Nishinaga M, Ishine M, Wada T, Okumiya K, Matsubayashi K, Yano S, Ichihara K, Cornelissen G, Halberg F, Ozawa T: Arterial stiffness independently predicts cardiovascular events in an elderly community – Longitudinal Investigation for the Longevity and Aging in Hokkaido County (LILAC) study. Biomed Pharmacother. 2005, 59 (Suppl 1): S40-44. 10.1016/S0753-3322(05)80008-3.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lambossy P: Oscillations forcées d'un liquide incompressible et visqueux dans un tube rigide et horizontal. Calcul de la force frotement. Helvetica Physica Acta. 1952, 25: 371-386.Google Scholar
- Womersley JR: Oscillatory motion of a viscous liquid in a thin-walled elastic tube. 1: The linear approximation for long waves. Philos Mag. 1955, 46: 199-231.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Caro CG, Pedley TJ, Schroter RC, Seed WA: The Mechanics of the Circulation. 1978, Oxford, UK: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
- West GB, Brown JH, Enquist BJ: A general model for the origin of allometric sc1ling laws in biology. Science. 1997, 276: 122-126. 10.1126/science.276.5309.122.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Warriner RK, Johnston KW, Cobbold RS: A viscoelastic model of arterial wall motion in pulsatile flow: implications for Doppler ultrasound clutter assessment. Physiol Meas. 2008, 29: 157-179. 10.1088/0967-3334/29/2/001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Painter PR, Eden P, Bengttson HU: Pulsatile blood flow, shear force, energy dissipation and Murray's Law. Theor Biol Med Model. 2006, 3: 31-10.1186/1742-4682-3-31.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Canic S, Hartley CJ, Rosenstrauch D, Tambaca J, Guidoboni G, Mikelic A: Blood flow in compliant arteries: an effective viscoelastic reduced model, numerics, and experimental validation. Ann Biomed Eng. 2006, 34: 575-592. 10.1007/s10439-005-9074-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marque V, Grima M, Kieffer P, Capdeville-Atkinson C, Atkinson J, Lartaud-Idjouadiene I: Determination of aortic elastic modulus by pulse wave velocity and wall tracking in a rat model of aortic stiffness. Vasc Res. 2001, 38: 546-550. 10.1159/000051090.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.