Open Access

Long range physical cell-to-cell signalling via mitochondria inside membrane nanotubes: a hypothesis

Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling201613:16

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12976-016-0042-5

Received: 29 January 2016

Accepted: 27 May 2016

Published: 6 June 2016

Abstract

Coordinated interaction of single cells by cell-to-cell communication (signalling) enables complex behaviour necessary for the functioning of multicellular organisms. A quite newly discovered cell-to-cell signalling mechanism relies on nanotubular cell-co-cell connections, termed “membrane nanotubes” (MNTs). The present paper presents the hypothesis that mitochondria inside MNTs can form a connected structure (mitochondrial network) which enables the exchange of energy and signals between cells. It is proposed that two modes of energy and signal transmission may occur: electrical/electrochemical and electromagnetic (optical). Experimental work supporting the hypothesis is reviewed, and suggestions for future research regarding the discussed topic are given.

Keywords

Membrane nanotubes Mitochondrial networks Mitochondrial reticulum Filamentous mitochondria Mitochondrial membrane potential Ultra-weak photon emission Cell-to-cell signalling Long-range signalling

Background

Cell-to-cell communication (signalling) is a crucial prerequisite for multicellular organisms that enables the emergence of complex behaviour evoked by the coordinated interaction of the single cells. Due to its fundamental function, a great variety of different cell-to-cell signalling mechanisms exist in parallel [14]. One quite newly discovered mechanism relies on nanotubular cell-to-cell connections, termed “membrane nanotubes” (MNTs), discovered just over 10 years ago [5]. Further research showed a great variety of functions of these MNTs including the exchange of different chemical and biological material [6, 7] as well as facilitation of electrical long-range coupling [8, 9]. There is accumulating evidence that mitochondria can be inside MNTs, possibly forming a connected structure (e.g., [10, 11]).

In the present paper, I review theoretical and experimental work that supports the hypothesis that mitochondria inside MNTs enable a long-range energy and signal exchange between cells. How to test this hypothesis, and what biological significance the hypothesis would have if correct, are also discussed.

Novel findings regarding membrane nanotubes and mitochondria

Direct cell-to-cell connections by membrane nanotubes

In 2004, the research group of H.-H. Gerdes published in a seminal paper in Science [5] compelling evidence of a “novel biological principle of cell-to-cell interaction” based on newly discovered “nanotubular structures”, termed “tunneling nanotubes”. The group was able to show that these nanotubular connections were present between different types of cells (rat pheochromocytoma (PC12), human embryonic kidney, and normal rat kidney cells), with diameters in the range of 50–200 nm and generally longer than single cells. MNTs can reach a length up to 1 mm as recently shown in human laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma cells [10].

Further research discovered that these “tunneling nanotubes”, later also called “membrane nanotubes” (MNTs) (the term also used in this paper), exhibit a large morphological and structural variety, despite the fact that all MNTs are filled with cytoplasm and have a lipid bilayer [12]. For example, most MNTs contain F-actin and some contain microtubules in addition (e.g., MNTs between primary neurons and astrocytes [13]). Önfelt et al. [14] discovered that all MNTs between human monocyte-derived macrophages contain F-actin, but microtubules were only present in thicker MNTs (i.e., having a diameter of > ~0.7 μm), indicating that the structural composition of MNTs not only depend on the specific cell type but also on the morphological features of the MNTs themselves.

The first detection of MNTs in vivo was published a few years later [15]. The analysis of MNTs in vivo showed that MNTs in this complex environment exhibit additional features not observed in previous studies; for example, MNTs in vivo can exist as contorted structures [16, 17], but MNTs forming straight tubes were also observed [18]. That individual MNTs could potentially stick together to form a single, thicker, MNT was reported recently [12].

Concerning the biological function of MNTs it was demonstrated that MNTs facilitate a great variety of different cell-to-cell communication mechanisms, ranging from the exchange of diverse signalling carriers (e.g., ions, proteins), organelles, bacteria, viruses [7, 1922], or the spread of depolarisation which enables long-distance electrical coupling between cells [8, 9]. MNTs are good electrical conductors [8] with a conductivity in general larger than gap junctions [23].

MNTs play an important role in intercellular signal transduction in general, functioning of the immune system, micro- and nano-particle delivery processes, embryogenesis and development, differentiation and cellular reprogramming, apoptosis, cellular metabolic adaptation to stressors, cancer initiation and progression, and pathogen transfer, as recently reviewed by Sisakhtnezhad and Khosravi [21]. In addition, MNTs may have an electrophysiological function in neurobiological processes [24].

Mitochondria inside membrane nanotubes

Several works observed that the cytoplasm inside MNTs can be (densely) occupied by mitochondria. This was shown for MNTs between liver macrophages [14], cardiomyocytes and cardiofibroblasts [25], endothelial cells and cancer cells [26], multipotent mesenchymal stem cells and vascular smooth muscle cells [27], mesenchymal stem cells and endothelial cells [11], cardiomyocytes and endothelial stem cells [28], human embryonic kidney cells and neuroblasoma cells [29], neural stem cells and brain microvascular endothelial cells [30], mesenchymal stem cells and cardiomyoblasts [31], bone-marrow-derived stromal cells and alveolar epithelial cells [32], rat pheochromocytoma cells [33], human peritonealmesothelial cells [34], primary human proximal tubular epithelial cells [35], human laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma cells [10], breast carcinoma cells [36], and rat hippocampal astrocytes [37].

The mitochondria inside MNTs can move, enabling a mitochondrial transfer between cells. Recently it was demonstrated that those MNTs that facilitate a mitochondrial transfer are also those that contain microtubules, and that the mitochondrial exchange can be regarded as a survival mechanism of damaged cells [33].

Importantly, the studies published so far about mitochondria inside MNTs not only showed that single mitochondria can be transferred between cells but that the density of mitochondria inside a MNT can be that high that the whole MNT seems to be filled with mitochondria (see Fig. 1). Antanavičiūtė et al. [10] highlighted this phenomenon by stating that a “dense network of mitochondria” could be observed in MNTs.
Fig. 1

Examples for microscopic images showing mitochondria inside MNTs. a MNT between human laryngeal squamous carcinoma cells. Image modified from Antanavičiūtė et al. [10]. b MNT between human proximal tubular epithelial cells. Image modified from Domhan et al. [35]. c MNTs between cardiomyoblasts and mesenchymal stem cells. Image modified from Cselenyák et al. [31]

Mitochondria: organelles with dynamic and diverse morphology

The outdated notion that mitochondria are generally spherical/ellipsoid organelles (having generally a diameter of 0.5–1 μm and a length of 1 μm) is increasingly being replaced by the modern view that mitochondria exist in a great variety of different shapes, and that their morphology also exhibits dynamical changes – a view now also adopted by established textbooks (e.g., [38]). The outdated view was basically due to the imaging of mitochondria by electron microscopy which lends itself to showing spherical/ellipsoid mitochondria. The reasons for this lies in the changes of mitochondria due to the sample preparation procedure (chemical fixation, dehydration and staining employed) and in the slice-based imaging that favours showing transverse sections of mitochondria [39].

Modern super-resolution microscopy made it possible to demonstrate that mitochondria exist in different forms ranging from spherical/ellipsoid shapes to long filamentous or tubular structures that can form also branched networks (reticula) of mitochondria [38]. In addition, the structure of the inner mitochondrial membrane (cristae) shows also different morphologies (e.g., disc-like lamellar, tubular, helical) [40, 41].

The variety of mitochondrial morphology can be described in approximation on a linear scale ranging from “fragmented” to “static hyperfused” (with the stated “microfused” and “dynamic hyperfused” in between) [42], or in a two-dimensional coordination system with the two axes “tubular/non-tubular” and “branched/condensed” [43], as well as in a four dimensional coordination system with the categories “size” (“smaller network” vs. “larger network”), “dynamics” (“over fused” vs. “over-fragmented”), “position” (“uniform distribution” vs. “asymmetric distribution”), and “shape” (from “non-tubulur” to “swollen tubes” to “less branching”) [44]. The morphology is dynamic and is determined by the ratio between mitochondrial fusion and fission [4547], mitochondrial tubulation mediated by the member of the Kinesin 1 family KIF5B [48], movement along and attachment at the microtubule component of the cytoskeleton by dynein and kinesin motor proteins [49, 50] or without motor proteins [51], and attachment and interaction with actin filaments as part of the cytoskeleton [51, 52] as well as with the endoplasmatic reticulum [5356]. According to recent theoretical work, the morphology of the mitochondrial network/reticulum is mainly determined by the “balance between anterograde and retrograde motility of mitochondria on microtubules” and by fusion/fission [57].

The morphological state of the mitochondria and their interaction forming mitochondrial networks is also strongly determined by the metabolic state. For example, inhibiting oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) (by blocking the activity of complexes I and III) induces fission of the mitochondrial reticulum (“thread-grain transition”) (whereas inhibiting the F0F1-ATP synthase is not associated with fission) [58], and quiescent cells exhibit generally distributed mitochondria whereas dividing/differentiating cells show more mitochondrial networks [59, 60]. The morphology depends also on the phase of the cell cycle (G1: fused mitochondria forming interconnected networks, G1/S transition: large tubular networks, S: hyperfused giant mitochondria, M: fragmentation, i.e.,fissioned mitochondria) [61] and is linked to the mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm) [6264] although the relationship is complex and the two variables can be also uncoupled [43, 65].

Additionally, the mitochondrial morphology depends on their spatial position inside the cell. Mitochondria naturally tend to aggregate around the nucleus (i.e., in the perinuclear region) and exist there in forms of mitochondrial networks; they also have a lower Δψm than the mitochondria in the periphery of the cell [58, 66]. A too large perinuclear agglomeration of mitochondria is indicative of cellular dysfunction, however [67]. The position of mitochondria in the cell is also determined to a large extend by the cytoskeleton, especially the microtubules radiating from the centrosome [68, 69].

It can be concluded that mitochondria inside a cell exhibit a great heterogeneity with respect to morphology and the metabolic state (indicated by Δψm) [66, 70]; in this context, the term “mitodiversity” was recently coined [71].

Mitochondria: sources of electrical currents and electromagnetic fields (non-radiating and radiating)

By applying novel voltage-sensitive nanoparticles Tyner et al. [72] could show that mitochondria are a strong source of intracellular electric (E) fields that can still be measured several μm away from the mitochondria in the cytosol (refuting the theoretical predictions that the field should be only significantly present at a distance of 1–10 nm beyond the mitochondrial membrane [73, 74]). The field strength is so strong that most probably the physiochemical properties of water around mitochondria are altered, as highlighted by Pollack [75] and Pokorný [76]. Also the water inside mitochondria is altered (higher viscosity [approx. 40 cP] [77], i.e.,15–20 times higher than the viscosity of the cytoplasm in erythrocytes [2.10–2.67 cP] [78], and more than 50 times higher than the viscosity of unbound “free” water [0.888 cP at 25 ° C; or 0.653 cP at 40 °C]) [79].

Concerning the finding of Tyner et al. of the extremely strong E-field around mitochondria it must be noted, however, that independent replications of it have not been published yet, and that the strong E-field around mitochondria are in contradiction with standard electrolyte theories predicting an E-field screening by mobile ions given by the Debye length. Further work is needed to clarify this issue.

The main source of the field is the mitochondrial membrane potential. Given a value of Δψm = −140 mV and a plasma membrane width of 5 nm, a field with a strength in the order of 3 × 107 V/m is predicted (with sufficient agreement with the experimentally measured value of about 3 × 106 V/m [72]). It is a quasi-static E-field, i.e., an E-field with slightly varying field strength depending on the continuous spontaneous variations of Δψm (“mitochondrial potential fluctuations” or “mitochondrial flickers”, as measured in various studies [8085]). The fluctuations are generally in the very-low frequency range with period lengths in the order of seconds or minutes (e.g., see Figure 7 in [81], Figure 1 in [84], and Figure 3 in [82]). Concerning the amplitude of the Δψm fluctuations, O’Reilly et al. [85] measured a fluctuation amplitude of 17.6 ± 1.0 mV (range: 6–130 mV, skewed distribution: ~75 % of the values: < 20 mV) in a large population of mitochondria (n = 360). Interestingly, the amplitude was directly correlated to the resting Δψm. The predicted E-field fluctuations are thus in the range of approx. 3 × 106 V/m.

Charge movement along the respiratory chain causes another quasi-static field in mitochondria (having the largest field strength at complexes I, II and IV) which seems to be the driving factor for the proton translocation in the mitochondrial membrane due to the Lorentz force caused [86].

Despite these low-frequency non-radiation quasi-static fields (or “electromagnetic” fields according to the terminology that unifies electric and magnetic components based on current electrodynamic theory) there is convincing experimental evidence that mitochondria are also the source of radiating high-frequency electromagnetic fields in the optical spectral region, measured as spontaneous (low-level) chemiluminescence or ultra-weak photon emission (UPE). Pioneering work with this respect was already done in the 1960s by Stauff and Ostrowski [87] who detected spontaneous UPE (with a photomultiplier with a maximal spectral sensitivity around 400–600 nm) from rat liver mitochondria, the intensity of which was dependent on O2 supply, age of the mitochondrial suspension and temperature (decreasing the temperature increased the UPE). Reactions with reactive oxygen species (ROS) were assumed to be the cause. Mitochondrial respiration produces continuously superoxide (O2 •−) in the mitochondrial matrix, predominantly on complex I, which can form hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in subsequent steps (2 H+ + O2 •− + O2 •− → H2O2 + O2) [88]. The amount of O2 •− generated depends thereby on four main factors: the electrochemical transmembrane H+ potential difference Δp (with its constituents the transmembrane electrical potential Δψ and the H+ concentration difference ΔpH), the NADH/NAD+ and CoQH2/CoQ ratios, as well as the local O2 concentration. Superoxide (i.e., in its anionic form (superoxide anion radical, O2 •−) and in its protonated form (HO2 ) is constantly produced from complexes I and III of the electron transport chain due to a premature “leak” of oxygen during the energy transduction [89, 90]. It is often mentioned in the literature that 1–2 % of the O2 consumed by the mitochondria is released as ROS, however, this number only applies to the in vitro situation with altered states of the mitochondria and different environmental factors. The in vivo production rate is yet unknown but estimated to be “far, far lower” than 1–2 %, approx. 5–10 times lower, i.e., 0.1–0.4 % [88].

Despite the ROS-based generation of UPE, proton flows through cytochrome oxidase enzymes in the mitochondrial membrane by itself were predicted to be another source of UPE (in the near-infrared spectral region with a peak at approx. 900 nm) [91] – the experimental detection of this peak in the UPE spectrum is however not reported yet due to low-sensitivity of photodetectors in this spectral range.

Spontaneous UPE of mitochondria in the optical spectral range (from ultraviolet to infrared) could be detected however by several other groups [9294], and it has been demonstrated that the UPE emission from mitochondria can be enhanced by the addition of iron [9597], acetaldehyde [98], H2O2 or tert-butyl hydroperoxide [93], succinate [94], NADH [94], or a cocktail of doxorubicin and iron(III) chloride [99]. That mitochondria emit UPE even in the ultraviolet range was demonstrated by Zhuralev et al. [92] measuring UPE from isolated liver mitochondria of rats using a photomultiplier sensitive in the spectral range of approx. 320–620 nm. Ultraviolet UPE was also reported by Konev et al. [100] using a photomultiplier with sensitivity in the range of approx. 300–450 nm to measure UPE from yeast cells. Also measuring yeast cells, Quickenden and Hee reported ultraviolet UPE (even as low as 200 nm) [101].

Concerning the cause of mitochondrial UPE emission, Hideg et al. [94] observed that the broad emission spectrum (450–800 nm) resembles the chemiluminescent spectrum from a linoleic acid/lipoxygenase reaction. This, in addition with the fact that the mitochondrial UPE emission is quenched by the addition of cyanide and antimycin-A (disturbing the respiratory electron transport), leads to the conclusion that the emission is mainly due to excited carbonyls formed by lipid peroxidation due to singlet oxygen [94]. Cytochrome-c could also be important in these processes in form of a catalyst [94]. Concerning the origin of the ultraviolet UPE of mitochondria, Konev [102] concluded that tryptophan seems to be mainly responsible.

Mitochondria as electrical transmission fibers

Already in the late 1960s, Skulachev from the Moscow State University came up with the conclusion that the electrochemical transmembrane H+ potential difference Δp (i.e., Δψ and ΔpH) can travel on a membrane so that membranes can be regarded as electric power-transmitting cables [103, 104]. Subsequent work supported that notion by reviewing evidence that Δp can be transported along membranes of different species/systems (i.e., demonstrated on Halobacterium membranes, chlorophyll-containing membranes, and cyanobacterial tichomes), and especially along the mitochondrial membrane [105]. Δp in the mitochondria is mainly formed by Δψm, i.e., at 37 °C Δp is given by Δp [mV] = Δψm – 60 ΔpHm, with typical values for mitochondria of Δψm = 150 and ΔpHm = −0.5 units, leading to Δp = 180 mV [106].

At least three charge transmission processes could take place on and in the mitochondria: (i) transmission of Δp (i.e., Δψm and ΔpHm) in form of diffusion of mobile ions (e.g., K+, Cl, Na+), (ii) lateral movement of H+ along the mitochondrial membrane surface (proton current) “via membrane-bound water molecules forming ice-like structure” (with an increased transmission rate since proton conductivity is higher in structured water, i.e., ice or bound water) and H+ movement inside the mitochondria, and (iii) by lateral and intermembrane electron (e) transport (electrical current) [105]. Proton conduction along the membranes, i.e., the water/lipid interface, has been demonstrated experimentally by several works [107110], and the view that water structuring is involved in the interfacial proton conductance has been strengthened by recent experiments (e.g., [110]). There could also be a charge and signal processing taking place on the mitochondrial membrane that propagates (with a high speed in the order of ~1 m/s) like a pulse (i.e., a propagating deformation of the membrane) with subsequent changes in the physiochemical state of the membrane, as proposed recently by Fichtl et al. [111].

Support for the view that mitochondria function as intracellular power-transmitting cables comes from various experimental works. A seminal work was published in 1988 [39] showing that local photodamage (induced by laser irradiation) of mitochondria of fibroblasts or cardiomyoctes causes a breakdown of Δψm over the whole length of the filamentous mitochondria (about 40 μm) and the mitochondrial network (in fibroblasts), as well as in the irradiated spherical/ellipsoid mitochondria and connected clusters of mitochondria (in cardiomyocytes). This results not only showed that “filamentous mitochondria and mitochondrial reticulum represent electrically united (cable) systems” and that there could be a “long-distance transmission of the mitochondrial electrical potential”, but also highlighted the fact that the electrical connectivity of mitochondria in a cell is a heterogeneous phenomenon: filamentous mitochondria are electrical conductors, mitochondrial networks can be electrically connected (either by forming a reticulum or due to intermitochondrial junctions) whereby there are also electrically isolated mitochondria [39, 112]. Intermitochondrial junctions, having a high electrical conductance, might play a regulatory role enabling or disabling the electrical conductance of end-to-end-joined mitochondria forming a mitochondrial network [112]. This regulatory factor would explain the fact that parts of the mitochondrial network can have a different Δψm [113, 114].

According to the work of De Giorgi et al. [115], changes of the gating status (i.e., opening and closing) of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (PTP) causes changed Δp which can propagate along the network, i.e., mitochondria “can form a dynamical proton-conducting network capable to propagate and commute the electrical signals locally generated during PTP gatings”.

The degree of electrical coupling between mitochondria depends on many factors, as for example the redox state of the cytoplasm. Local photodamage of a mitochondrial reticulum in HeLa cells showed no large spread of depolarisation, indicating an only small size of electrically-connected mitochondria. However, cells pretreated with MitoQ (an antioxidant) before performing the local mitochondrial photodamage showed that “the area of depolarisation around local photodamage drastically increased and reached 30–50 % of total mitochondrial population” [58].

Recently, as published in Science, Glancy et al. [116] showed that the primary pathway of skeletal muscle energy distribution is “membrane potential conduction via the mitochondrial reticulum”, in agreement with the early work of Skulachev about mitochondria acting as electric power-transmitting cables [103105].

A visualisation of the electrical transmission mechanism in mitochondria is shown in Fig. 2a.
Fig. 2

The two possible physical energy transmission mechanisms in mitochondria: a electrical/electrochemical, and b optical (light). The arrows indicate the possible transmission directions. 1: proton conductance along the mitochondrial membrane. Whereas the existence of mechanism a is experimentally proven, mechanism b is currently only predicted by theory and no experimental investigation into the correctness of the prediction has yet been published

Spatio-temporal oscillations in Δψm of mitochondrial networks: an emergent property of mitochondrial coupling

If mitochondria inside a cell are generally not functionally isolated but can be linked together electrically/electrochemically, emergent network properties (like synchronized and wave-like spreading changes of Δψm) should be observed. Indeed this is the case and was reported [117119]. Individual mitochondria and whole networks show inter-mitochondrial coupling and synchronization due to “mitochondrion-to-mitochondrion coupling” [117]. The Δψm of the whole network can oscillate, especially if the redox state of the cell is shifted to more oxidized reactions. This phenomenon was shown in mitochondria of intact pig heart cardiac myocytes (mean Δψm frequency (f): f = 10.30–58.1 mHz, corresponding to a period length (T) of T ≈ 17–97 s). Interestingly, on the mitochondrial network of freshly isolated myocytes, the mean frequency of synchronized Δψm oscillations was found to depend on the type of medium; i.e., with glucose: f = 8.73–22.3 mHz (T = 44.8–114 s), with pyruvate: f = 3.7–54.83 mHz (T = 18–270 s), with lactate: f = 3.9–15.0 mHz (T = 66–256 s), with β-hydroxybutyrate: f = 4.0–10.1 mHz (T = 11–99 s). The mean frequency was found to be correlated with the mitochondrial cluster size displaying the synchronized oscillations: the lower f, the higher the synchronized mitochondrial cluster area. This “large-scale synchronization in mitochondrial dynamics” documented by Kurz et al. [117] could be a result of the physical and electrical coupling of mitochondria as described by Skulachev. In addition, wave-like ROS-induced ROS releases [120123] among neighboring mitochondria seem to play a role too. Physiochemically connected mitochondria thus exhibit self-organized dynamic coupling leading to synchronized oscillations – a form of “mitochondrial criticality” as defined by Aon et al. [124, 125], and possibly also related to fluctuations of the mitochondrial redox state ([NAD(P)H/NAD(P)+]) [126] Δψm [127] showing temporal scale-invariant long-range correlations. Aon et al. concluded that “cardiac mitochondria behave as a network of coupled oscillators under both physiological and pathophysiological conditions” [127]. When the number of fluctuating mitochondria in a network exceeds a critical threshold value (i.e., a percolation threshold), a global phase transition of the network state occurs, leading to spontaneous synchronisation of the fluctuations so that a coherent oscillation emerges [127].

Electrical mitochondrial coupling: biological significance for energy and signal transmission

Why do mitochondria form mitochondrial networks and exhibit electrical coupling? An answer to this question was recently given by a study conducted by Hoizing et al. [42] in which it was concluded that three main reasons can be given: (i) increased ATP production (as experimentally observed [128130]), (ii) increased robustness against perturbations (e.g., fused mitochondria are more robust against stress than non-fused ones [131]), and (iii) mitochondrial quality control (functionally healthy mitochondria have a higher probability to fuse [132]). In addition, the hypothesis of Skulachev [105, 112] should be considered that mitochondrial networks or filamentous mitochondria enable energy transmission from parts of the cell with higher O2 concentration to parts with lower O2 concentration, enabling OXPHOS also in these regions. Coupled mitochondria might also even facilitate O2 transport along the inner mitochondrial membrane [39] and enable a fast energy transmission in general [116].

Mitochondria as optical transmission fibers

In 2004 Thar and Kühl [133] published a paper in which they concluded, based on a review of experimental facts, that there could be “electromagnetic radiation propagating along the mitochondrial reticulum” due to the “light guiding properties of the mitochondrial network”, facilitating “long-range interaction between individual mitochondria”. The authors derived this conclusion by analyzing the biophysical properties of mitochondria and the cytoplasm: filamentous mitochondria resemble optical waveguides with a core refractive index (n) higher than the index of the cladding (n mito = 1.4, n cyto = 1.35) and a cutoff wavelength (λ c) of 145 nm (λ c = 1.305 D(n mito 2n cyto 2)1/2, with D = 300 nm the average thickness of a filamentous mitochondrion), i.e., mitochondria could act like single-mode optical fibers (waveguides) enabling the transport of electromagnetic radiation with a wavelength higher than 145 nm. That mitochondria are indeed a source of optical radiation (in the wavelength rang of approx. 450–750 nm) was shown in “Mitochondria: sources of electrical currents and electromagnetic fields (non-radiating and radiating)”. Thar and Kühl, being aware of the experimental work about the mitochondrial spontaneous low-level chemiluminescence, hypothesized that the “light generated in one mitochondrion could propagate along the network and, e.g., trigger some chemical reaction in another mitochondrion.”

Thar and Kühl even postulated that the inner mitochondrial structure (with a refractive index of the matrix of n = 1.5 and of the intramembrane space of n = 1.35, as well as the lamellar cristae structure) resembles an optical multi-layer system possibly enabling a light amplification mechanism due to induced emission and optical feedback (comparable to a distributed feedback laser). An experimental proof of this hypothesis is lacking though due to current technical limitations of detecting the optical emission of single mitochondria and analyzing it for their coherence-properties. However, the simulation by Thar and Kühl of the reflectance and transmittance spectra of a model mitochondrion measuring 5 μm in length and showing the light amplification mechanism delivered spectra with maxima in the region of approx. 400–550 nm, close to the spectral peaks of the ultra-weak photon emission from isolated mitochondria [94].

The optical radiation could also not only be transmitted in directly fused or connected mitochondria but also between mitochondria separated with a gap when the distance of the gap is smaller than the optical wavelength [133]. The observation that mitochondria can regulate their activity even when separated with a quartz glass [134] might be a related phenomenon.

The optical electromagnetic radiation may also couple into microtubules attached to the mitochondria (due to the evanescence field around the mitochondria), or vice versa [133]. Microtubules (having a refractive index of n microt = 1.51 [135]) can also be regarded as electromagnetic (optical) wave-guides (with a cutoff wavelength of approx. 21 nm, using a diameter value of the microtubules of 24 nm [136]). However, the cutoff wavelength is in the extreme ultraviolet spectral range and such radiation would automatically create large damages of the microtubules due to the ionizing effect of this kind of highly energetically radiation. Thus, an optical near-field coupling between mitochondria and microtubules seems to be not likely.

However, there could be an optical near-field coupling between mitochondria and the cellular nucleus due to refractive-index matching (the refractive index of the nucleus, n = 1.355–1.365 [137], is similar to the mitochondrial one), forming an electromagnetically energy (and possibly also signal) transmission system. Such a scenario is interesting to consider since it is known that there is a clustering of mitochondria around the nucleus in the cell [138143], and even direct attachment of mitochondria to the nucleus (e.g., [144]).

But is the flux (photons/time) of UPE sufficient to enable such an optical-based energy and signal transmission in general? Given the fact the production rate of ROS by mitochondria is quite low 0.1–0.4 % and that the amount of photons produced by the excited species is very low too (much lower than 10−5 [145]), it seems to be unlikely that that amount of UPE flux can have any regulative meaning for biological reactions. However, when assuming that there are additional sources of UPE generation in mitochondria (as summarized) and that mitochondria may enable light-amplification as proposed by Thar and Kühl the possibility of much higher UPE fluxes in mitochondria should not be ruled out. Also the measured UPE flux may not represent the in vivo UPE flux per se since only a fraction of the UPE produced by mitochondria may be emitted into the cytoplasm. The function of mitochondria as optical cables would prevent the escape of UPE from the optical medium which enables the light guiding effect, i.e., the inner space of mitochondria with the mitochondrial membrane as the “cladding” of the “optical fiber”.

For a visualisation of the hypothesized optical transmission in mitochondria please refer to Fig. 2b.

Optical mitochondrial coupling: biological significance for energy and signal transmission

Concerning the function of mitochondrial electromagnetic (optical) energy and signal transmission in the biological context, a few suggestions have been published so far.

The most recent was published by Bagkos et al. [146], putting forward the idea that the optical emission of mitochondria might be a factor involved in mitochondrial retrograde signalling (i.e., the regulating of nuclear gene expression by mitochondrial signals [147149]). Bagkos et al. propose the following cascade of events happening in the cell: (i) mitochondria cause UPE, (ii) light-sensitive nuclear receptors in the nuclear membrane absorb the light, and (iii) the activation regulates nuclear gene expression. Since each nuclear receptor has a specific absorption spectrum (which peaks generally in the optical region, i.e., visible and near-infrared), changes in the spectral composition of UPE lead to the activation of specific nuclear receptors, deepening on the match between the emission and absorption spectra.

Work by Albrecht-Buehler showed that cells form surface projections to infrared light sources, but only when the light was pulsed (e.g., 1 pulse/s) [150]. Later experiments revealed that the centrosome of the cell seemingly functions as a photoreceptor [151]. If endogenous UPE can activate the centrosome in the same way is currently unknown, however. Centrosomes are important structures in the cells, not only because of their role as microtubule organizer but also since they function as “coordination centres in eukaryotic cells, at which specific cytoplasmic proteins interact at high concentrations and important cell decisions are made” [152]. The significance of centrosomes is also highlighted by the fact that abnormalities (concerning structure, size, number) are a “hallmark” of cancer cells, and that this phenomeonon “may play a dominant role in tumour initiation and progression” [153]. In addition, synchronized electric oscillations of the centrosome, microtubules and chromosomes are a source of an quasi-static field that may play an important part in the regulation of mitosis and meiosis, according to the hypothesis of Zhao and Zhan [154].

Another mechanism how (weak) light could play a role in cellular physiology was already proposed in the 1980s by Kato et al. [155]: cytochrome c oxidase (COX), the terminal enzyme of the respiratory chain in mitochondria, acts like a photoreceptor. This reasoning was further strengthened by the work of T. Karu [156]: she discovered that the characteristics of response of cells to light (i.e., the photobiological response) vary according to the absorption spectrum of COX. Peaks in both the cell biological reactivity as well as the COX absorption spectrum are in the red to near-infrared optical region [156, 157]. In this spectral region, differences in the wavelength of the irradiated light can have opposite cellular effects, as observed for example by Gordon and Surry [158] (650 nm: increase in OXPHOS, 725 nm: decrease), and Karu et al. [159] (632.8 nm: increase in intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) concentration, 760 nm: decrease), as summarized by Karu et al. [156]. This behavior can be explained by taking into account that the redox state as well as specific single chromophores of COX also have different absorption maxima, i.e., the Cu A site of COX absorbs maximally at 620 nm (reduced state) or 830 nm (oxidized state), and the Cu B size at 760 nm (reduced) or 680 nm (oxidized) [156]. The light-mediated activation of COX is followed by a change in the redox state of the mitochondrion and thus eventually of the whole cell. It has not been investigated experimentally whether the endogenous UPE, generated and transmitted by mitochondria, is able to activate COX.

In addition, the impact of light on water properties must be mentioned. It was shown that the water layer on hydrophilic surfaces (which exist in a specific phase [160]) increased in size due to light exposure, especially in the infrared region [161]. The specific state of water (e.g., higher viscosity) inside mitochondria and around mitochondria could thus be also influenced by the UPE produced by mitochondria. Another effect, proposed recently by Sommer et al. [162], is that near-infrared light seems to influence the viscosity of water inside mitochondria. Near-infrared light exposure is linked to decreased water viscosity that could enhance the performance of the ATP synthase due to nanomechanical improvements of the rotational mechanism.

Moreover, there are theoretical works that assign UPE a functional role in the development and the functioning of the optical visual system [163174].

Finally, there is a prediction, already made in the 1970s [175], that there could be a mechanism of gene regulation based on the following signal process: (i) UPE is generated by mitochondria, (ii) UPE interacts with the tryptophan in proteins attached to the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) polymers in the cell due to matching of the UPE spectra of mitochondria and absorption spectra of tryptophan (maximum in the UV range), (iii) the interaction leads to a change in the electrical conductance of the DNA, followed by (iv) further processes that finally lead to gene regulation. Unfortunately, no follow-up work considering this hypothesis has been published so far.

Hypothesis: energy and signal exchange between cells via mitochondrial fibers inside MNTs

Based on the information given in the previous sections, the following hypothesis is proposed: mitochondria inside MNTs enable energy and signal exchange between cells. Key aspects of the proposed hypothesis are visualized by Fig. 3. The hypothesis can be divided into three parts:
Fig. 3

Visualization of the hypothesis that mitochondria inside MNTs enable energy and signal exchange between cells

  1. 1.

    Mitochondria inside MNTs, formed between cells, can exist as a connected structure either (i) as filamentous mitochondria connected to each other via intermitochondrial junctions, (ii) in the form of a mitochondrial network, or (iii) as a combination of both forms.

     
  2. 2.

    The mitochondrial connection via MNTs functions as a structure conducting (i) charges (acting as an electrical cable), and/or (ii) electromagnetic radiation in the optical wavelength region (acting as an optical cable).

     
  3. 3.

    Both the electrical and optical energy transmitted by the mitochondria inside MNTs allow for (i) energy as well as (ii) signal exchange between cells.

     

How well is the above hypothesis supported by experimental evidence?

The predicted continuous/connected mitochondria inside MNTs (part 1 of the hypothesis) has not yet been explicitly investigated and proven. However, the existence of mitochondria inside MNTs is proven, and that the mitochondria form cable-like structures inside MNTs can be seen in several microscopic images published (see Fig. 1).

Concerning the predicted transfer of charges and electromagnetic radiation along mitochondria inside MNTs (part 2 of the hypothesis), no experiments have been performed. That there could be an electrical coupling between cells via MNTs has been demonstrated [8, 9, 13, 176]. However, the question of whether mitochondria can be involved in the electrical cell-to-cell coupling has not been addressed so far. Charge transport along filamentous mitochondria and networks is proven to occur and the notation that mitochondria act as “electrical transmission fibers” agrees with experimental findings (see “Mitochondria as electrical transmission fibers”). That mitochondria are also generating electromagnetic radiation in the optical wavelength range is proven (see “Mitochondria: sources of electrical currents and electromagnetic fields (non-radiating and radiating)”). The ability of mitochondria to transmit this radiation (or even amplify it) has not been demonstrated experimentally yet but was predicted theoretically (see “Mitochondria: sources of electrical currents and electromagnetic fields (non-radiating and radiating)”).

Part 3 of the hypothesis states that electrical and optical energy is potentially transmitted between the cells by the mitochondria inside MNTs to enable a transfer of energy and signals, i.e., the transmission facilitates physiological processes linked to cell-to-cell communication. That cell-to-cell coupling via MNTs occurs and that this coupling serves important physiological functions (e.g., during development) is proven [6, 21, 177179]. That the functional cell-to-cell coupling can be due to the processes described in part 3 of the hypothesis has not been investigated so far. One scenario could be that these processes enable an “intercellular mitochondrial retrograde signalling”, i.e., the mitochondria in cell A could affect the nuclear gene expression of cell B (and vice versa) due to the physical coupling via mitochondria inside MNTs. Also the cell-to-cell coupling could enable an intercellular information exchange that couples the mitochondrial network of the cells together which could lead to novel emergent behaviour of the mitochondrial networks. Such emergent behaviour might even enable the storage of information or intracellular signal-processing, as recently suggested to happen in mitochondrial networks [180].

Conclusions

In the present paper I reviewed the current knowledge about the possible role of mitochondria in MNTs for cell-to-cell communication based on physical energy and signal transmission. The proposed hypothesis (i.e., the three parts of it see “Hypothesis: Energy and signal exchange between cells via mitochondrial fibers inside MNTs”) should be tested by novel cell biological experiments.

The proposed hypothesis may be tested by the following experiments (see also Fig. 4):
Fig. 4

Visualization of the possible experiments to test the proposed hypothesis. a Laser stimulation to locally disrupt the Δψm in one cell. It is then tested if the mitochondrial network in the cell connected by the MNT also shows a breakdown of Δψm. b Monitoring the spontaneous fluctuations of Δψm in both cells connected by a MNT filled with connected mitochondria. A synchronization of the fluctuations should be observed (case 1). When disrupting the mitochondrial connectivity (at point 3) of the mitochondrial network inside the MNT the synchronization should disappear (case 2). c Shining light into a filamentous mitochondrion and measuring the light intensity at the other end of it will proof if mitochondria can act as optical fibers

  1. 1.

    Experiment 1 (testing for electrical coupling): The experiment should be performed on two cells (A and B) that are connected by a MNT. It must be ensured that the MNT is filled by a mitochondrial network. The electrophysiological state of it (Δψm) is monitored by fluorescence probes. The mitochondrial network of cell A is then disturbed by shining a laser pulse on the part of the mitochondrial network present in cell A. If the hypothesis of an electrical coupling of cells via the mitochondria inside MNTs is true this local disruption of Δψm in cell A will travel along the mitochondrial network in the MNT so that also the part of the mitochondrial network present in cell B will be effected (i.e., it will show a disruption of Δψm as well). This experiment is similar to the experiment already done by Amchenkova et al. [39] investigating the electrical coupling within a mitochondrial network.

     
  2. 2.

    Experiment 2 (testing for electrical coupling): As another possibility to test whether cells connected by a MNTs with mitochondria inside show electrical coupling is analysing the spontaneous fluctuations of Δψm in cell A and B. A synchronous fluctuation is indicative for an electrical coupling via the MNT connections (case 1). When disrupting the mitochondrial continuity inside the MTT, the synchronization should disappear (case 2).

     
  3. 3.

    Experiment 3 (testing for optical coupling): A direct test for optical coupling of cells via a mitochondrial network inside a MNT is hard to realize due to the extremely weak light to be expected to be present and the necessity to measure it very locally (i.e., in the nm range). In addition, since it is expected that the optical radiation travels inside the mitochondrial network (i.e., shielded from the environment) any measurement aiming to measure the radiation is faced with the challenge that the measurement process will most probably affect the measurement results since the optical guidance properties of the mitochondrial network will be changed. However, the following experiment could be imagined: At one end of a mitochondrial network a laser pulse is applied and at the other end of it is tested if the light impulse can be detected. This would demonstrate the ability of a mitochondrial network of acting like a waveguide in the optical spectral region.

     

Furthermore, additional experimental (and theoretical) work is needed to investigate further related questions such as (i) whether the electrical and electromagnetic signals/radiation also couples to other cellular structures, as already proposed by several works [133, 181187], and (ii) how this interaction between different networks (e.g., mitochondrial, cytoskeleton, endoplasmatic reticulum) might be important for inter- and intracellular signalling and organization.

Finally, it must be investigated what other possibilities for electrical coupling of cells via MNTs exist. Especially two aspects should be investigated in detail: coupling via actin and/or microtubules. F-actin is present in most MNTs, microtubules in some [13, 14]. Actin can transmit electrical signals [188193], and microtubules have this property too [192201]. It is thus also likely that there are different possibilities and routes of electrical signalling between cells via a MNT: by mitochondria, actin and/or microtubules. It is possible that all three pathways can be active in parallel so that a multi-modal electrical signalling could happen between cells connected by a MNT. In the present manuscript I focused on mitochondria; the possible involvement of actin and microtubules in MNT based electrical cell-to-cell coupling should be a topic for future research and work.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

I thank Rachel Scholkmann for proofreading the manuscript.

Funding

Self-funded.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Biomedical Optics Research Laboratory, Department of Neonatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich
(2)
Research Office for Complex Physical and Biological Systems (ROCoS)

References

  1. Reguera G. When microbial conversations get physical. Trends Microbiol. 2011;19(3):105–13. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2010.12.007.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Scholkmann F, Fels D, Cifra M. Non-chemical and non-contact cell-to-cell communication: a short review. Am J Transl Res. 2013;5(6):586–93.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Gerdes HH, Pepperkok R. Cell-to-cell communication: current views and future perspectives. Cell Tissue Res. 2013;352(1):1–3. doi:10.1007/s00441-013-1590-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Bloemendal S, Kuck U. Cell-to-cell communication in plants, animals, and fungi: a comparative review. Naturwissenschaften. 2013;100(1):3–19. doi:10.1007/s00114-012-0988-z.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Rustom A, Saffrich R, Markovic I, Walther P, Gerdes H-H. Nanotubular highways for intercellular organelle transport. Science. 2004;303(5660):1007–10. doi:10.1126/science.1093133.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Gerdes HH, Rustom A, Wang X. Tunneling nanotubes, an emerging intercellular communication route in development. Mech Dev. 2013;130(6–8):381–7. doi:10.1016/j.mod.2012.11.006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Zhang JH, Zhang YY. Membrane nanotubes: novel communication between distant cells. Sci China Life Sci. 2013;56(11):994–9. doi:10.1007/s11427-013-4548-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Wang X, Veruki ML, Bukoreshtliev NV, Hartveit E, Gerdes H-H. Animal cells connected by nanotubes can be electrically coupled through interposed gap-junction channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(40):17194–9. doi:10.1073/pnas.1006785107.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Wang X, Gerdes H-H. Long-distance electrical coupling via tunneling nanotubes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1818(8):2082–6. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.09.002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Antanavičiūtė I, Rysevaite K, Liutkevicius V, Marandykina A, Rimkute L, Sveikatiene R, et al. Long-distance communication between laryngeal carcinoma cells. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e99196. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0099196.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu K, Ji K, Guo L, Wu W, Lu H, Shan P, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells rescue injured endothelial cells in an in vitro ischemia-reperfusion model via tunneling nanotube like structure-mediated mitochondrial transfer. Microvasc Res. 2014;92:10–8. doi:10.1016/j.mvr.2014.01.008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Austefjord MW, Gerdes H-H, Wang X. Tunneling nanotubes. Diversity in morphology and structure. Commun Integr Biol. 2014;7(1):e27934. doi:10.4161/cib.27934.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Wang X, Bukoreshtliev NV, Gerdes H-H. Developing neurons form transient nanotubes facilitating electrical coupling and calcium signaling with distant astrocytes. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47429. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047429.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Önfelt B, Nedvetzki S, Benninger RK, Purbhoo MA, Sowinski S, Hume AN, et al. Structurally distinct membrane nanotubes between human macrophages support long-distance vesicular traffic or surfing of bacteria. J Immunol. 2006;177(12):8476–83.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Chinnery HR, Pearlman E, McMenamin PG. Cutting edge: membrane nanotubes in vivo: a feature of MHC class II+ cells in the mouse cornea. J Immunol. 2008;180(9):5779–83. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.180.9.5779.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Seyed-Razavi Y, Hickey MJ, Kuffova L, McMenamin PG, Chinnery HR. Membrane nanotubes in myeloid cells in the adult mouse cornea represent a novel mode of immune cell interaction. Immunol Cell Biol. 2013;91(1):89–95. doi:10.1038/icb.2012.52icb201252.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Lou E, Fujisawa S, Morozov A, Barlas A, Romin Y, Dogan Y, et al. Tunneling nanotubes provide a unique conduit for intercellular transfer of cellular contents in human malignant pleural mesothelioma. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33093. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033093.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Pyrgaki C, Trainor P, Hadjantonakis AK, Niswander L. Dynamic imaging of mammalian neural tube closure. Dev Biol. 2010;344(2):941–7. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.06.010.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Marzo L, Gousset K, Zurzolo C. Multifaceted roles of tunneling nanotubes in intercellular communication. Front Physiol. 2012;3(72). doi:10.3389/fphys.2012.00072.
  20. Gerdes HH, Carvalho RN. Intercellular transfer mediated by tunneling nanotubes. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008;20(4):470–5. doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2008.03.005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Sisakhtnezhad S, Khosravi L. Emerging physiological and pathological implications of tunneling nanotubes formation between cells. Eur J Cell Biol. 2015;94(10):429–43. doi:10.1016/j.ejcb.2015.06.010.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. McCoy-Simandle K, Hanna SJ, Cox D. Exosomes and nanotubes: control of immune cell communication. Biochem Cell Biol. 2015. in press.Google Scholar
  23. Bathany C, Baeahm DL, Besch S, Sachs F, Hua SZ. A microfluidic platform for measuring electrical activity across cells. Biomicrofluidics. 2012;6:034121. doi:10.1063/1.4754599.PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Scholkmann F. Two emerging topics regarding long-range physical signaling in neurosystems: membrane nanotubes and electromagnetic fields. J Integr Neurosci. 2015;14(2):135–53. doi:10.1142/S0219635215300115.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. He K, Shi X, Zhang X, Dang S, Ma X, Liu F, et al. Long-distance intercellular connectivity between cardiomyocytes and cardiofibroblasts mediated by membrane nanotubes. Cardiovasc Res. 2011;92(1):39–47. doi:10.1093/cvr/cvr189.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Pasquier J, Guerrouahen BS, Al Thawadi H, Ghiabi P, Maleki M, Abu-Kaoud N, et al. Preferential transfer of mitochondria from endothelial to cancer cells through tunneling nanotubes modulates chemoresistance. J Transl Med. 2013;11:94. doi:10.1186/1479-5876-11-94.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Vallabhaneni KC, Haller H, Dumler I. Vascular smooth muscle cells initiate proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells by mitochondrial transfer via tunneling nanotubes. Stem Cells Dev. 2012;21(17):3104–13. doi:10.1089/scd.2011.0691.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Koyanagi M, Brandes RP, Haendeler J, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Cell-to-cell connection of endothelial progenitor cells with cardiac myocytes by nanotubes: a novel mechanism for cell fate changes? Circ Res. 2005;96(10):1039–41. doi:10.1161/01.RES.0000168650.23479.0c.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith IF, Shuai J, Parker I. Active generation and propagation of Ca2+ signals within tunneling membrane nanotubes. Biophys J. 2011;100(8):L37–9. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2011.03.007.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang X, Yu X, Xie C, Tan Z, Tian Q, Zhu D et al. Rescue of brain function using tunneling nanotubes between neural stem cells and brain microvascular endothelial cells. Mol Neurobiol. 2015. in press.Google Scholar
  31. Cselenyak A, Pankotai E, Horvath EM, Kiss L, Lacza Z. Mesenchymal stem cells rescue cardiomyoblasts from cell death in an in vitro ischemia model via direct cell-to-cell connections. BMC Cell Biol. 2010;11:29. doi:10.1186/1471-2121-11-291471-2121-11-29.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Islam MN, Das SR, Emin MT, Wei M, Sun L, Westphalen K, et al. Mitochondrial transfer from bone-marrow-derived stromal cells to pulmonary alveoli protects against acute lung injury. Nat Med. 2012;18(5):759–65. doi:10.1038/nm.2736nm.2736.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang X, Gerdes HH. Transfer of mitochondria via tunneling nanotubes rescues apoptotic PC12 cells. Cell Death Differ. 2015;22(7):1181–91. doi:10.1038/cdd.2014.211cdd2014211.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Ranzinger J, Rustom A, Heide D, Morath C, Schemmer P, Nawroth PP, et al. The receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) plays a key role in the formation of nanotubes (NTs) between peritoneal mesothelial cells and in murine kidneys. Cell Tissue Res. 2014;357(3):667–79. doi:10.1007/s00441-014-1904-y.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Domhan S, Ma L, Tai A, Anaya Z, Beheshti A, Zeier M, et al. Intercellular communication by exchange of cytoplasmic material via tunneling nano-tube like structures in primary human renal epithelial cells. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21283. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021283.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Berrdidge MV, Crasso C, Neuzil J. Mitochondrial genome transfer to tumour cells breaks the rules and establishes a new precedent in cancer biology. Mol Cell Oncol. 2015. in press.Google Scholar
  37. Wang Y, Cui J, Sun X, Zhang Y. Tunneling-nanotube development in astrocytes depends on p53 activation. Cell Death Differ. 2011;18(4):732–42. doi:10.1038/cdd.2010.147.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Morgan D, Raff M, Roberts K et al., editors. Molecular biology of the cell. 6th ed. New York: Garland Science; 2014.Google Scholar
  39. Amchenkova AA, Bakeeva LE, Chentsov YS, Skulachev VP, Zorov DB. Coupling membranes as energy-transmitting cables. I. Filamentous mitochondria in fibroblasts and mitochondrial clusters in cardiomyocytes. J Cell Biol. 1988;107(2):481–95.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Kuhlbrandt W. Structure and function of mitochondrial membrane protein complexes. BMC Biol. 2015;13:89. doi:10.1186/s12915-015-0201-x.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Corsaro D, Michel R, Walochnik J, Muller KD, Greub G. Saccamoeba lacustris, sp. nov. (Amoebozoa: Lobosea: Hartmannellidae), a new lobose amoeba, parasitized by the novel chlamydia ‘Candidatus Metachlamydia lacustris’ (Chlamydiae: Parachlamydiaceae). Eur J Protistol. 2010;46(2):86–95. doi:10.1016/j.ejop.2009.11.002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Hoitzing H, Johnston IG, Jones NS. What is the function of mitochondrial networks? A theoretical assessment of hypotheses and proposal for future research. Bioessays. 2015;37(6):687–700. doi:10.1002/bies.201400188.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Vowinckel J, Hartl J, Butler R, Ralser M. MitoLoc: A method for the simultaneous quantification of mitochondrial network morphology and membrane potential in single cells. Mitochondrion. 2015;24:77–86. doi:10.1016/j.mito.2015.07.001.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Rafelski SM. Mitochondrial network morphology: building an integrative, geometrical view. BMC Biol. 2013;11(1):71. doi:10.1186/1741-7007-11-71.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Nunnari J, Marshall WF, Straight A, Murray A, Sedat JW, Walter P. Mitochondrial transmission during mating in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is determined by mitochondrial fusion and fission and the intramitochondrial segregation of mitochondrial DNA. Mol Biol Cell. 1997;8(7):1233–42.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Chan DC. Mitochondrial fusion and fission in mammals. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2006;22:79–99. doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.22.010305.104638.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Chen H, Chan DC. Emerging functions of mammalian mitochondrial fusion and fission. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14 Spec No. 2:R283–9. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddi270.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang C, Du W, Su QP, Zhu M, Feng P, Li Y, et al. Dynamic tubulation of mitochondria drives mitochondrial network formation. Cell Res. 2015;25(10):1108–20. doi:10.1038/cr.2015.89.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Pilling AD, Horiuchi D, Lively CM, Saxton WM. Kinesin-1 and Dynein are the primary motors for fast transport of mitochondria in Drosophila motor axons. Mol Biol Cell. 2006;17(4):2057–68. doi:10.1091/mbc.E05-06-0526.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Melkov A, Simchoni Y, Alcalay Y, Abdu U. Dynamic microtubule organization and mitochondrial transport are regulated by distinct Kinesin-1 pathways. Biol Open. 2015. doi: 10.1242/bio.015206.
  51. Li T, Zheng F, Cheung M, Wang F, Fu C. Fission yeast mitochondria are distributed by dynamic microtubules in a motor-independent manner. Sci Rep. 2015;5:11023. doi:10.1038/srep11023.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Boldogh IR, Pon LA. Interactions of mitochondria with the actin cytoskeleton. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1763(5–6):450–62. doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.02.014.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Friedman JR, Lackner LL, West M, DiBenedetto JR, Nunnari J, Voeltz GK. ER tubules mark sites of mitochondrial division. Science. 2011;334(6054):358–62. doi:10.1126/science.1207385.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Bravo R, Gutierrez T, Paredes F, Gatica D, Rodriguez AE, Pedrozo Z, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum: ER stress regulates mitochondrial bioenergetics. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2012;44(1):16–20. doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2011.10.012.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Hoppins S, Nunnari J. Cell biology. Mitochondrial dynamics and apoptosis--the ER connection. Science. 2012;337(6098):1052–4. doi:10.1126/science.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Youle RJ, van der Bliek AM. Mitochondrial fission, fusion, and stress. Science. 2012;337(6098):1062–5. doi:10.1126/science.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Sukhorukov VM, Meyer-Hermann M. Structural heterogeneity of mitochondria Induced by the microtubule cytoskeleton. Sci Rep. 2015;5:13924.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Pletjushkina OY, Lyamzaev KG, Popova EN, Nepryakhina OK, Ivanova OY, Domnina LV, et al. Effect of oxidative stress on dynamics of mitochondrial reticulum. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1757(5–6):518–24. doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2006.03.018.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Wanet A, Arnould T, Najimi M, Renard P. Connecting mitochondria, metabolism, and stem cell fate. Stem Cells Dev. 2015;24(17):1957–71. doi:10.1089/scd.2015.0117.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Westermann B. Bioenergetic role of mitochondrial fusion and fission. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1817(10):1833–8. doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.02.033.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Lopez-Mejia IC, Fajas L. Cell cycle regulation of mitochondrial function. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2015;33:19–25. doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2014.10.006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Legros F, Lombes A, Frachon P, Rojo M. Mitochondrial fusion in human cells is efficient, requires the inner membrane potential, and is mediated by mitofusins. Mol Biol Cell. 2002;13(12):4343–54. doi:10.1091/mbc.E02-06-0330.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Ishihara N, Jofuku A, Eura Y, Mihara K. Regulation of mitochondrial morphology by membrane potential, and DRP1-dependent division and FZO1-dependent fusion reaction in mammalian cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;301(4):891–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Twig G, Hyde B, Shirihai OS. Mitochondrial fusion, fission and autophagy as a quality control axis: the bioenergetic view. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1777(9):1092–7. doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2008.05.001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Bajic A, Spasic M, Andjus PR, Savic D, Parabucki A, Nikolic-Kokic A, et al. Fluctuating vs. continuous exposure to H(2)O(2): the effects on mitochondrial membrane potential, intracellular calcium, and NF-kappaB in astroglia. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e76383. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076383.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Collins TJ, Berridge MJ, Lipp P, Bootman MD. Mitochondria are morphologically and functionally heterogeneous within cells. EMBO J. 2002;21(7):1616–27. doi:10.1093/emboj/21.7.1616.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Wang X, Su B, Fujioka H, Zhu X. Dynamin-like protein 1 reduction underlies mitochondrial morphology and distribution abnormalities in fibroblasts from sporadic Alzheimer’s disease patients. Am J Pathol. 2008;173(2):470–82. doi:10.2353/ajpath.2008.071208.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Bornens M. The centrosome in cells and organisms. Science. 2012;335(6067):422–6. doi:10.1126/science.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Schatten H. The mammalian centrosome and its functional significance. Histochem Cell Biol. 2008;129(6):667–86. doi:10.1007/s00418-008-0427-6.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Kuznetsov AV, Margreiter R. Heterogeneity of mitochondria and mitochondrial function within cells as another level of mitochondrial complexity. Int J Mol Sci. 2009;10(4):1911–29. doi:10.3390/ijms10041911.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Popkov VA, Plotnikov EY, Lyamzaev KG, Silachev DN, Zorova LD, Pevzner IB, et al. Mitodiversity. Biochemistry (Mosc). 2015;80(5):532–41. doi:10.1134/S000629791505003X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Tyner KM, Kopelman R, Philbert MA. “Nanosized voltmeter” enables cellular-wide electric field mapping. Biophys J. 2007;93(4):1163–74. doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.092452.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Kamp F, Chen YD, Westerhoff HV. Energization-induced redistribution of charge carriers near membranes. Biophys Chem. 1988;30(2):113–32.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Olivotto M, Arcangeli A, Carla M, Wanke E. Electric fields at the plasma membrane level: a neglected element in the mechanisms of cell signalling. Bioessays. 1996;18(6):495–504. doi:10.1002/bies.950180612.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Pollack GH. Cells, gels and the enginers of life. Ebner and Sons: Washington; 2001.Google Scholar
  76. Pokorný J. Physical aspects of biological activity and cancer. AIP Adv. 2012;2:011207.Google Scholar
  77. Lopez-Beltran EA, Mate MJ, Cerdan S. Dynamics and environment of mitochondrial water as detected by 1H NMR. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(18):10648–53.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Price WS, Kuchel PW, Cornell BA. Microviscosity of human erythrocytes studied with hypophosphite and 31P-NMR. Biophys Chem. 1989;33(3):205–15.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Holmes MJ, Parker NG, Povery MJW. Temperature dependence of bulk viscosity in water using acoustic spectroscopy. J Phys Conf Ser. 2011;269(1):012011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Huser J, Blatter LA. Fluctuations in mitochondrial membrane potential caused by repetitive gating of the permeability transition pore. Biochem J. 1999;343(Pt 2):311–7.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Loew LM, Tuft RA, Carrington W, Fay FS. Imaging in five dimensions: time-dependent membrane potentials in individual mitochondria. Biophys J. 1993;65(6):2396–407. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81318-3.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Buckman JF, Reynolds IJ. Spontaneous changes in mitochondrial membrane potential in cultured neurons. J Neurosci. 2001;21(14):5054–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Diaz G, Falchi AM, Gremo F, Isola R, Diana A. Homogeneous longitudinal profiles and synchronous fluctuations of mitochondrial transmembrane potential. FEBS Lett. 2000;475(3):218–24.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Vergun O, Votyakova TV, Reynolds IJ. Spontaneous changes in mitochondrial membrane potential in single isolated brain mitochondria. Biophys J. 2003;85(5):3358–66. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74755-9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. O’Reilly CM, Fogarty KE, Drummond RM, Tuft RA, Walsh Jr JV. Quantitative analysis of spontaneous mitochondrial depolarizations. Biophys J. 2003;85(5):3350–7. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74754-7.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Menendez RG. An electromagnetic coupling hypothesis to explain the proton translocation mechanism in mitochondria, bacteria and chloroplasts. Med Hypotheses. 1996;47(3):179–82.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Stauff J, Ostrowski J. Chemilumineszenz von Mitochondrien. Z Naturforsch. 1967;22(7):734–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Murphy MP. How mitochondria produce reactive oxygen species. Biochem J. 2009;417:1–13.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  89. Muller FL, Liu YH, Van Remmen H. Complex III releases superoxide to both sides of the inner mitochondrial membrane. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(47):49064–73. doi:10.1074/jbc.M407715200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  90. St-Pierre J, Buckingham JA, Roebuck SJ, Brand MD. Topology of superoxide production from different sites in the mitochondrial electron transport chain. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(47):44784–90. doi:10.1074/jbc.M207217200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  91. Tuszynski JA, Dixon JM. Quantitative analysis of the frequency spectrum of the radiation emitted by cytochrome oxidase enzymes. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2001;64(5 Pt 1):051915. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.64.051915.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  92. Zhuravlev AI, Tsvylev OP, Zubkova SM. [Spontaneous endogenous ultraweak luminescence of rat liver mitochondria in conditions of normal metabolism] (in Russia). Biofizika. 1973;18(6):1037–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Radi R, Sims S, Cassina A, Turrens JF. Roles of catalase and cytochrome c in hydroperoxide-dependent lipid peroxidation and chemiluminescence in rat heart and kidney mitochondria. Free Radic Biol Med. 1993;15(6):653–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Hideg È, KObayashi M, Inaba H. Spontaneous ultraweak light emission from respiring spinach leaf mitochondria. Biochitnh’a et Biophysica Acta. 1991;1098(1):27–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. Wang HP, Kimura T. Ferrous ion-mediated cytochrome P-450 degradation and lipid peroxidation in adrenal cortex mitochondria. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1976;423(3):374–81.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  96. Palacios A, Piergiacomi VA, Catala A. Vitamin A supplementation inhibits chemiluminescence and lipid peroxidation in isolated rat liver microsomes and mitochondria. Mol Cell Biochem. 1996;154(1):77–82.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. Marzoev AI, Kozlov AV, Vladimirov YA. Inhibition of lipid-peroxidation in mitochondria isolated from the liver of hypothyroid rabbits. B Exp Biol Med. 1982;93(3):275–7. doi:10.1007/Bf00834000.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  98. Boh EE, Baricos WH, Bernofsky C, Steele RH. Mitochondrial chemiluminescence elicited by acetaldehyde. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 1982;14(2):115–33.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  99. Kitada M, Horie T, Awazu S. Chemiluminescence associated with doxorubicin-induced lipid peroxidation in rat heart mitochondria. Biochem Pharmacol. 1994;48(1):93–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Konev SV, Lyskova TI, Niesenbaum GD. Very weak bioluminescence of cells in the ultraviolet region of the spectrum and its biological role. Biofizika. 1966;11(2):361–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Quickenden TI, Hee SSQ. The spectral distribution of the luminescence emitted during growth of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its relationship to mitogenetic radiation. Photochem Photobiol. 1976;23(3):201–4. doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.1976.tb07242.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  102. Konev SV. Fluorescence and phosphorescence of proteins and nucleic acids. New York: Springer; 1967.Google Scholar
  103. Skulachev VP. Energy transformations in the respiratory chain. Curr Top Bioenerg. 1971;4:127–90.Google Scholar
  104. Skulachev VP. Energy accumulation processes in the cell [in Russia]. Moscow: Nauka; 1969.Google Scholar
  105. Skulachev VP. Integrating functions of biomembranes. Problems of lateral transport of energy, metabolites and electrons. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1980;604(3):297–310.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Perry SW, Norman JP, Barbieri J, Brown EB, Gelbard HA. Mitochondrial membrane potential probes and the proton gradient: a practical usage guide. Biotechniques. 2011;50(2):98–115. doi:10.2144/000113610.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  107. Teissie J, Prats M, Soucaille P, Tocanne JF. Evidence for conduction of protons along the interface between water and a polar lipid monolayer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985;82(10):3217–21.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  108. Serowy S, Saparov SM, Antonenko YN, Kozlovsky W, Hagen V, Pohl P. Structural proton diffusion along lipid bilayers. Biophys J. 2003;84(2 Pt 1):1031–7. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74919-4.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  109. Prats M, Teissie J, Tocanne JF. Lateral proton conduction at lipid water interfaces and its implications for the chemiosmotic-coupling hypothesis. Nature. 1986;322(6081):756–8. doi:10.1038/322756a0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  110. Springer A, Hagen V, Cherepanov DA, Antonenko YN, Pohl P. Protons migrate along interfacial water without significant contributions from jumps between ionizable groups on the membrane surface (vol 108, pg 14461, 2011). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(44):18185. doi:10.1073/pnas.1115664108.Google Scholar
  111. Fichtl B, Shrivastava S, Schneider MF. Protons at the speed of sound: specific biological signaling from physics. arXiv. 2015;150300952.Google Scholar
  112. Skulachev VP. Mitochondrial filaments and clusters as intracellular power-transmitting cables. Trends Biochem Sci. 2001;26(1):23–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  113. Chen LB, Summerhayes IC, Johnson LV, Walsh ML, Bernal SD, Lampidis TJ. Probing mitochondria in living cells with rhodamine 123. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1982;46(Pt 1):141–55.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  114. Kuznetsov AV, Troppmair J, Sucher R, Hermann M, Saks V, Margreiter R. Mitochondrial subpopulations and heterogeneity revealed by confocal imaging: possible physiological role? Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1757(5–6):686–91. doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2006.03.014.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  115. De Giorgi F, Lartigue L, Ichas F. Electrical coupling and plasticity of the mitochondrial network. Cell Calcium. 2000;28(5–6):365–70.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  116. Glancy B, Hartnell LM, Malide D, Yu ZX, Combs CA, Connelly PS, et al. Mitochondrial reticulum for cellular energy distribution in muscle. Nature. 2015;523(7562):617–20. doi:10.1038/nature14614.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  117. Kurz FT, Derungs T, Aon MA, O’Rourke B, Armoundas AA. Mitochondrial networks in cardiac myocytes reveal dynamic coupling behavior. Biophys J. 2015;108(8):1922–33. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2015.01.040.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  118. Kurz FT, Aon MA, O’Rourke B, Armoundas AA. Spatio-temporal oscillations of individual mitochondria in cardiac myocytes reveal modulation of synchronized mitochondrial clusters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(32):14315–20. doi:10.1073/pnas.1007562107.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  119. Kurz FT, Aon MA, O’Rourke B, Armoundas AA. Wavelet analysis reveals heterogeneous time-dependent oscillations of individual mitochondria. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2010;299(5):H1736–40. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00640.2010.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  120. Zorov DB, Filburn CR, Klotz LO, Zweier JL, Sollott SJ. Reactive oxygen species (ROS)-induced ROS release: a new phenomenon accompanying induction of the mitochondrial permeability transition in cardiac myocytes. J Exp Med. 2000;192(7):1001–14.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  121. Brady NR, Hamacher-Brady A, Westerhoff HV, Gottlieb RA. A wave of reactive oxygen species (ROS)-induced ROS release in a sea of excitable mitochondria. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2006;8(9–10):1651–65. doi:10.1089/ars.2006.8.1651.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  122. Zhou L, Aon MA, Almas T, Cortassa S, Winslow RL, O’Rourke B. A reaction-diffusion model of ROS-induced ROS release in a mitochondrial network. PLoS Comput Biol. 2010;6(1):e1000657. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000657.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  123. Gilroy S, Suzuki N, Miller G, Choi WG, Toyota M, Devireddy AR, et al. A tidal wave of signals: calcium and ROS at the forefront of rapid systemic signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 2014;19(10):623–30. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2014.06.013.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  124. Aon MA, Cortassa S, Akar FG, O’Rourke B. Mitochondrial criticality: a new concept at the turning point of life or death. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1762(2):232–40. doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2005.06.008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  125. Aon MA, Cortassa S, O’Rourke B. Percolation and criticality in a mitochondrial network. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(13):4447–52. doi:10.1073/pnas.0307156101.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  126. Ramanujan VK, Biener G, Herman BA. Scaling behavior in mitochondrial redox fluctuations. Biophys J. 2006;90(10):L70–2. doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.083501.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  127. Aon MA, Cortassa S, O’Rourke B. The fundamental organization of cardiac mitochondria as a network of coupled oscillators. Biophys J. 2006;91(11):4317–27. doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.087817.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  128. Mitra K, Wunder C, Roysam B, Lin G, Lippincott-Schwartz J. A hyperfused mitochondrial state achieved at G1-S regulates cyclin E buildup and entry into S phase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(29):11960–5. doi:10.1073/pnas.0904875106.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  129. Gomes LC, Di Benedetto G, Scorrano L. During autophagy mitochondria elongate, are spared from degradation and sustain cell viability. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13(5):589–98. doi:10.1038/ncb2220.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  130. Rambold AS, Kostelecky B, Elia N, Lippincott-Schwartz J. Tubular network formation protects mitochondria from autophagosomal degradation during nutrient starvation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(25):10190–5. doi:10.1073/pnas.1107402108.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  131. Mai S, Klinkenberg M, Auburger G, Bereiter-Hahn J, Jendrach M. Decreased expression of Drp1 and Fis1 mediates mitochondrial elongation in senescent cells and enhances resistance to oxidative stress through PINK1. J Cell Sci. 2010;123(Pt 6):917–26. doi:10.1242/jcs.059246.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  132. Twig G, Elorza A, Molina AJ, Mohamed H, Wikstrom JD, Walzer G, et al. Fission and selective fusion govern mitochondrial segregation and elimination by autophagy. EMBO J. 2008;27(2):433–46. doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601963.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  133. Thar R, Kühl M. Propagation of electromagnetic radiation in mitochondria? J Theor Biol. 2004;230(2):261–70. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.05.021.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  134. Bat’ianov AP. Distant-optical interaction of mitochondria through quartz. Biull Eksp Biol Med. 1984;97(6):675–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Sato H, Ellis GW, Inoue S. Microtubular origin of mitotic spindle form birefringence. Demonstration of the applicability of Wiener’s equation. J Cell Biol. 1975;67(3):501–17.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  136. Tucker JB, Mathews SA, Hendry KA, Mackie JB, Roche DL. Spindle microtubule differentiation and deployment during micronuclear mitosis in Paramecium. J Cell Biol. 1985;101(5 Pt 1):1966–76.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  137. Choi W, Fang-Yen C, Badizadegan K, Oh S, Lue N, Dasari RR, et al. Tomographic phase microscopy. Nat Methods. 2007;4(9):717–9. doi:10.1038/nmeth1078.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  138. Dzeja PP, Bortolon R, Perez-Terzic C, Holmuhamedov EL, Terzic A. Energetic communication between mitochondria and nucleus directed by catalyzed phosphotransfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(15):10156–61. doi:10.1073/pnas.152259999.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  139. Nishi Y, Takeshita T, Sato K, Araki T. Change of the mitochondrial distribution in mouse ooplasm during in vitro maturation. J Nippon Med Sch. 2003;70(5):408–15.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  140. Costa FG, Adolfi MC, Gomes CC, Jesus LW, Batlouni SR, Borella MI. Testes of Astyanax altiparanae: the Sertoli cell functions in a semicystic spermatogenesis. Micron. 2014;61:20–7. doi:10.1016/j.micron.2014.02.004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  141. De Paepe B, Smet J, Vanlander A, Seneca S, Lissens W, De Meirleir L, et al. Fluorescence imaging of mitochondria in cultured skin fibroblasts: a useful method for the detection of oxidative phosphorylation defects. Pediatr Res. 2012;72(3):232–40. doi:10.1038/pr.2012.84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  142. Lam M, Shigemasa Y, Exintaris B, Lang RJ, Hashitani H. Spontaneous Ca2+ signaling of interstitial cells in the guinea pig prostate. J Urol. 2011;186(6):2478–86. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.082.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  143. Prowse AB, Chong F, Elliott DA, Elefanty AG, Stanley EG, Gray PP, et al. Analysis of mitochondrial function and localisation during human embryonic stem cell differentiation in vitro. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52214. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052214.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  144. Brandt PW, Pappas GD. Mitochondria. II. The nuclear-mitochondrial relationship in Pelomyxa carolinensis Wilson (Chaos chaos L.). J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1959;6(1):91–6.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  145. Sławiński J. Luminescence research and its relation to ultraweak cell radiation. Experientia. 1988;44(7):559–71. doi:10.1007/bf01953303.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  146. Bagkos G, Koufopoulos K, Piperi C. Mitochondrial emitted electromagnetic signals mediate retrograde signaling. Med Hypotheses. 2015;85(6):810–8. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2015.10.004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  147. da Cunha FM, Torelli NQ, Kowaltowski AJ. Mitochondrial retrograde signaling: triggers, pathways, and outcomes. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2015;2015:482582. doi:10.1155/2015/482582.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  148. Liu Z, Butow RA. Mitochondrial retrograde signaling. Annu Rev Genet. 2006;40:159–85. doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090613.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  149. Butow RA, Avadhani NG. Mitochondrial signaling: the retrograde response. Mol Cell. 2004;14(1):1–15.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  150. Albrecht-Buehler G. Surface extensions of 3T3 cells towards distant infrared light sources. J Cell Biol. 1991;114(3):493–502.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  151. Albrecht-Buehler G. Cellular infrared detector appears to be contained in the centrosome. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1994;27:262–71.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  152. Conduit PT, Wainman A, Raff JW. Centrosome function and assembly in animal cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015;16(10):611–24. doi:10.1038/nrm4062.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  153. Chan JY. A clinical overview of centrosome amplification in human cancers. Int J Biol Sci. 2011;7(8):1122–44.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  154. Zhao Y, Zhan Q. Electric fields generated by synchronized oscillations of microtubules, centrosomes and chromosomes regulate the dynamics of mitosis and meiosis. Theor Biol Med Model. 2012;9:26. doi:10.1186/1742-4682-9-26.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  155. Kato M, Shinizawa K, Yoshikawa S. Cytochrome oxidase is a possible photo receptor in mitochondria. Photobiochem Photobiophys. 1981;2:263–70.Google Scholar
  156. Karu T. Primary and secondary mechanisms of action of visible to near-IR radiation on cells. J Photochem Photobiol B. 1999;49(1):1–17. doi:10.1016/S1011-1344(98)00219-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  157. Mason MG, Nicholls P, Cooper CE. The steady-state mechanism of cytochrome c oxidase: redox interactions between metal centres. Biochem J. 2009;422(2):237–46. doi:10.1042/BJ20082220.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  158. Gordon SA, Surrey K. Red and far-red action on oxidative phosphorylation. Radiat Res. 1960;12:325–39.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  159. Karu TI, Tiphlova OA, Lukpanova GG, Parkhomenko IM. Effect of irradiation with monochromatic visible light on cAMP content in Chinese hamster fibroblasts. Il Nuovo Cimento D. 1987;9(10):1245–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  160. Zheng JM, Pollack GH. Long-range forces extending from polymer-gel surfaces. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2003;68(3 Pt 1):031408. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.68.031408.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  161. Chai B, Yoo H, Pollack GH. Effect of radiant energy on near-surface water. J Phys Chem B. 2009;113(42):13953–8. doi:10.1021/jp908163w.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  162. Sommer AP, Haddad M, Fecht HJ. Light effect on water viscosity: implication for ATP biosynthesis. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12029. doi:10.1038/srep12029.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  163. Tang R, Dai J. Biophoton signal transmission and processing in the brain. J Photochem Photobiol B: Biology. 2013. [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2013.12.008.
  164. Bókkon I, Salari V, Scholkmann F, Dai J, Grass F. Interdisciplinary implications on autism, savantism, Asperger syndrome and the biophysical picture representation: thinking in pictures. Cogn Syst Res. 2013;22–23:67–77. doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2012.05.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  165. Bókkon I, Salari V, Tuszynski JA. Emergence of intrinsic representations of images by feedforward and feedback processes and bioluminescent photons in early retinotopic areas. J Integr Neurosci. 2011;10(1):47–64.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  166. Bókkon I, Salari V, Tuszynski JA, Antal A. Estimation of the number of biophotons involved in the visual perception of a single-object image: Biophoton intensity can be considerably higher inside cells than outside. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol. 2010;100(3):160–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  167. Bokkon I, Scholkmann F, Salari V, Csaszar N, Kapocs G. Endogenous spontaneous ultraweak photon emission in the formation of eye-specific retinogeniculate projections before birth. Rev Neurosci. 2015. doi:10.1515/revneuro-2015-0051.Google Scholar
  168. Császár N, Scholkmann F, Salari V, Szőke H, Bókkon I. Phosphene perception is due to the ultra-weak photon emission produced in various parts of the visual system: glutamate in the focus. Rev Neurosci. 2016. in press.Google Scholar
  169. Salari V, Valian H, Bassereh H, Bokkon I, Barkhordari A. Ultraweak photon emission in the brain. J Integr Neurosci. 2015;14(3):419–29. doi:10.1142/S0219635215300012.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  170. Bokkon I, Salari V. Hypothesis about brilliant lights by bioluminescent photons in near death experiences. Med Hypotheses. 2012;79(1):47–9. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2012.03.028.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  171. Salari V, Rahnama M, Tuszynski JA. Dissipationless transfer of visual information from retina to the primary visual cortex in the human brain. Act Nerv Super. 2012;54(1–2):26–48.Google Scholar
  172. Sun Y, Wang C, Dai JP. Biophotons as neural communication signals demonstrated by in situ biophoton autography. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2010;9(3):315–22. doi:10.1039/b9pp00125e.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  173. Bokkon I, Vimal RLP, Wang C, Dai J, Salari V, Grass F, et al. Visible light induced ocular delayed bioluminescence as a possible origin of negative afterimage. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2011;103(2):192–9. doi:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2011.03.011.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  174. Bokkon I, Dai JP, Antal I. Picture representation during REM dreams: a redox molecular hypothesis. Biosystems. 2010;100(2):79–86. doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2010.01.005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  175. Popp FA, Strauß VE. So könnte Krebs entstehen. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer; 1979.Google Scholar
  176. Pascoal P, Kosanic D, Gjoni M, Vogel H. Membrane nanotubes drawn by optical tweezers transmit electrical signals between mammalian cells over long distances. Lab Chip. 2010;10(17):2235–41. doi:10.1039/c004659k.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  177. Lou E, Fujisawa S, Barlas A, Romin Y, Manova-Todorova K, Moore MA, et al. Tunneling nanotubes: a new paradigm for studying intercellular communication and therapeutics in cancer. Commun Integr Biol. 2012;5(4):399–403. doi:10.4161/cib.20569.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  178. Marzo L, Gousset K, Zurzolo C. Multifaceted roles of tunneling nanotubes in intercellular communication. Front Physiol. 2012;3:72. doi:10.3389/fphys.2012.00072.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  179. Abounit S, Zurolo C. Wiring through tunneling nanotubes – from electrical signals to organelle transfer. J Cell Sci. 2012;125:1089–98.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  180. Picard M. Mitochondrial synapses: intracellular communication and signal integration. Trends Neurosci. 2015;38(8):468–74. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2015.06.001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  181. Rahnama M, Tuszynski JA, Bokkon I, Cifra M, Sardar P, Salari V. Emission of mitochondrial biophotons and their effect on electrical activity of membrane via microtubules. J Integr Neurosci. 2011;10(1):65–88. doi:10.1142/S0219635211002622.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  182. Pokorny J, Vedruccio C, Cifra M, Kucera O. Cancer physics: diagnostics based on damped cellular elastoelectrical vibrations in microtubules. Eur Biophys J. 2011;40(6):747–59. doi:10.1007/s00249-011-0688-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  183. Srobar F. Impact of mitochondrial electric field on modal occupancy in the Frohlich model of cellular electromagnetism. Electromagn Biol Med. 2013;32(3):401–8. doi:10.3109/15368378.2012.735207.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  184. Cifra M, Pokorny J, Jelinek F, Kucera O. Vibrations of electrically polar structures in biosystems give rise to electromagnetic field: theories and experiments. Piers 2009 Moscow Vols I and Ii, Proceedings. 2009:138–42.Google Scholar
  185. Cifra M, Havelka D, Deriu MA. Electric field generated by longitudinal axial microtubule vibration modes with high spatial resolution microtubule model. J Phys Conf Ser. 2011;329. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/329/1/012013.
  186. Cifra M, Pokorny J, Havelka D, Kucera O. Electric field generated by axial longitudinal vibration modes of microtubule. Biosystems. 2010;100(2):122–31. doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2010.02.007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  187. Salari V, Tuszynski J, Bokkon I, Rahnama M, Cifra M. On the photonic cellular interaction and the electric activity of neurons in the human brain. J Phys Conf Ser. 2011;329. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/329/1/012006.
  188. Lin EC, Cantiello HF. A novel method to study the electrodynamic behavior of actin filaments. Evidence for cable-like properties of actin. Biophys J. 1993;65(4):1371–8. doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(93)81188-3.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  189. Gartzke J, Lange K. Cellular target of weak magnetic fields: ionic conduction along actin filaments of microvilli. AJP: Cell Physiology. 2002;283(5):C1333–46. doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00167.2002.Google Scholar
  190. Tuszyński JA, Portet S, Dixon JM, Luxford C, Cantiello HF. Ionic wave propagation along actin filaments. Biophys J. 2004;86(4):1890–903. doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(04)74255-1.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  191. Sataric MV, Sekulic DL, Sataric BM. Actin filaments as the fast pathways for calcium ions involved in auditory processes. J Biosci. 2015;40(3):549–59. doi:10.1007/s12038-015-9547-z.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  192. Friesen DE, Craddock TJA, Kalra AP, Tuszynski JA. Biological wires, communication systems, and implications for disease. Biosystems. 2015;127:14–27. doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2014.10.006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  193. Woolf NJ, Priel A, Tuszynski JA. Nanoneuroscience. New York: Springer; 2010.Google Scholar
  194. Priel A, Ramos AJ, Tuszynski JA, Cantiello HF. A biopolymer transistor: electrical amplification by microtubules. Biophys J. 2006;90(12):4639–43. doi:10.1529/biophysj.105.078915.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  195. Craddock TJA, Tuszynski JA, Priel A, Freedman H. Microtubule ionic conduction and its implications for higher cognitive functions. J Integr Neurosci. 2010;09(02):103–22. doi:10.1142/s0219635210002421.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  196. Sekulić DL, Satarić BM, Tuszynski JA, Satarić MV. Nonlinear ionic pulses along microtubules. Eur Phys J E. 2011;34(5). doi:10.1140/epje/i2011-11049-0.
  197. Havelka D, Cifra M, Kučera O. Multi-mode electro-mechanical vibrations of a microtubule: in silico demonstration of electric pulse moving along a microtubule. Appl Phys Lett. 2014;104(24):243702. doi:10.1063/1.4884118.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  198. Sekulic D, Sataric M. Microtubule as nanobioelectronic nonlinear circuit. Serbian J Electr Eng. 2012;9(1):107–19. doi:10.2298/sjee1201107s.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  199. Sekulic DL, Sataric MV. An improved electrical model of microtubule as biomolecular nonlinear transmission line. In: Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Microelectronics Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Microelectronics (Belgrade, Spain, 11-14 May); 2014. p. 111–4. doi:10.1109/miel.2014.6842098.
  200. Sataric MV, Sekulic DL, Sataric BM, Zdravkovic S. Role of nonlinear localized Ca2+ pulses along microtubules in tuning the mechano–sensitivity of hair cells. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2015;119(2):162–74. doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2015.07.009.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  201. Tuszynski J, Brown JA, Hawrylak P. Dielectric polarization, electrical conduction, information processing and quantum computation in microtubules. Are they plausible? Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci. 1998;356(1743):1897–926. doi:10.1098/rsta.1998.0255.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Scholkmann. 2016